Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark One);
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 1-13610
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
TEXAS
|
|
75-6446078 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
17950 Preston Road, Suite 600, Dallas, TX 75252
|
|
(972) 349-3200 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Registrants telephone number) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). YES o NO þ
As of July 31, 2009, the Registrant had outstanding 10,548,354 Common Shares of Beneficial
Interest, par value $.01 per share.
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART I
Financial Information
ITEM 1.
Financial Statements
1
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
184,415 |
|
|
$ |
179,807 |
|
Retained interests in transferred assets |
|
|
25,399 |
|
|
|
33,248 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
8,945 |
|
|
|
10,606 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
225,443 |
|
|
$ |
227,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND BENEFICIARIES EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
$ |
27,070 |
|
|
$ |
27,070 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
23,800 |
|
|
|
22,700 |
|
Structured notes and debentures payable |
|
|
13,428 |
|
|
|
8,168 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiary |
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
|
3,876 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
3,967 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
2,884 |
|
Borrower advances |
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
2,819 |
|
Deferred gains on property sales |
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
72,794 |
|
|
|
73,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficiaries equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares of beneficial interest; authorized 100,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value;
11,084,683 and 11,066,283 shares issued at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively, 10,548,354 and 10,694,788 shares outstanding at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
152,563 |
|
|
|
152,460 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of retained interests in transferred assets |
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
Cumulative net income |
|
|
164,115 |
|
|
|
160,925 |
|
Cumulative dividends |
|
|
(160,898 |
) |
|
|
(156,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,650 |
|
|
|
157,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Treasury stock; at cost, 536,329 and 371,495 shares at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
(4,901 |
) |
|
|
(3,825 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total parent company beneficiaries equity |
|
|
151,749 |
|
|
|
153,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests cumulative preferred stock of subsidiary |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total beneficiaries equity |
|
|
152,649 |
|
|
|
154,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and beneficiaries equity |
|
$ |
225,443 |
|
|
$ |
227,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
5,636 |
|
|
$ |
7,285 |
|
|
$ |
2,785 |
|
|
$ |
3,519 |
|
Income from retained interests in transferred assets |
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
4,196 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
Other income |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
7,863 |
|
|
|
12,636 |
|
|
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
6,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and related benefits |
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
Interest |
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
Provision for (reduction of) loan losses, net |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
Permanent impairments on retained interests in transferred assets |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
4,773 |
|
|
|
6,313 |
|
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
3,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before income tax benefit (provision) and discontinued operations |
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
|
6,323 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
3,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (provision) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
3,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sales of real estate |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,190 |
|
|
$ |
6,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,564 |
|
|
$ |
3,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
10,599 |
|
|
|
10,766 |
|
|
|
10,548 |
|
|
|
10,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
10,599 |
|
|
|
10,766 |
|
|
|
10,548 |
|
|
|
10,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,190 |
|
|
$ |
6,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,564 |
|
|
$ |
3,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
unrealized appreciation of retained interests in transferred assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) arising during period |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
(844 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(901 |
) |
Net realized gains included in net income |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
3,329 |
|
|
$ |
5,966 |
|
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
$ |
2,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF BENEFICIARIES EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Transferred |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stock of |
|
|
Beneficiaries |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, January 1, 2008 |
|
|
10,765,033 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
152,331 |
|
|
$ |
1,945 |
|
|
$ |
151,119 |
|
|
$ |
(145,921 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,231 |
) |
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
157,254 |
|
Net unrealized depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(946 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
16,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
Dividends ($0.425 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,579 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, June 30, 2008 |
|
|
10,781,533 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
152,427 |
|
|
$ |
999 |
|
|
$ |
158,031 |
|
|
$ |
(150,500 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,231 |
) |
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
158,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Transferred |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stock of |
|
|
Beneficiaries |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, January 1, 2009 |
|
|
10,694,788 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
152,460 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
$ |
160,925 |
|
|
$ |
(156,829 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,825 |
) |
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
154,362 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
18,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
Treasury shares, net |
|
|
(164,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,076 |
) |
Dividends ($0.385 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,069 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
10,548,354 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
152,563 |
|
|
$ |
759 |
|
|
$ |
164,115 |
|
|
$ |
(160,898 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,901 |
) |
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
152,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,190 |
|
|
$ |
6,912 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Permanent impairments on retained interests in transferred assets |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
Gains on sales of real estate |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(762 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
Provision for loan losses, net |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Premium income adjustment |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Amortization and accretion, net |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Capitalized loan origination costs |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
Loans funded, held for sale |
|
|
(6,454 |
) |
|
|
(3,404 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of guaranteed loans |
|
|
7,677 |
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
Loan fees remitted, net |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
Borrower advances |
|
|
(1,262 |
) |
|
|
49 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(1,236 |
) |
|
|
(177 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
4,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans funded |
|
|
(1,348 |
) |
|
|
(24,700 |
) |
Principal collected on loans |
|
|
7,541 |
|
|
|
20,661 |
|
Principal collected on retained interests in transferred assets |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
Principal collected on mortgage-backed security of affiliate |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Investment in retained interests in transferred assets |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
(2,820 |
) |
Release of (investment in) restricted investments, net |
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
4,707 |
|
|
|
(4,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares |
|
|
(1,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from (repayment of) revolving credit facility, net |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
(1,350 |
) |
Payment of principal on structured notes |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Redemption of redeemable preferred stock of subsidiary |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(6,295 |
) |
|
|
(5,384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(8,531 |
) |
|
|
(6,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,661 |
) |
|
|
(6,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
10,606 |
|
|
|
11,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
8,945 |
|
|
$ |
4,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying interim financial statements of PMC Commercial Trust (PMC Commercial or together
with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, we, us or our) have not been audited by independent
accountants. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete
financial statement presentation. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect
all adjustments necessary to present a fair statement of our financial position at June 30, 2009
and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. These
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. All material intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of future financial results. Therefore, these financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Upon adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements (FAS 160), cumulative preferred stock of subsidiary was
reclassified from the mezzanine section of the balance sheet to beneficiaries equity and minority
interest as presented in the income statement was reclassified to interest expense. These
reclassifications had no effect on previously reported consolidated net income or cash flows, but
the adoption of FAS 160 and resulting prior period reclassification does increase our overall
consolidated beneficiaries equity.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (1) the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and (2) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
In preparing the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements, we have reviewed, as
determined necessary by our management, events that have occurred after June 30, 2009, up until the
issuance of the financial statements on August 7, 2009.
Each of our qualified special purpose entities (QSPEs) contains a clean-up call provision which
gives PMC Commercial the option to repay the outstanding structured notes of the QSPE. PMC Joint
Venture, L.P. 2002 (the 2002 Joint Venture) reached this option during January 2009 becoming a
non-qualifying SPE; however, based on our current liquidity needs, the option was not exercised.
The subsidiary was determined to be a variable interest entity. Since we have regained control as
a result of our clean-up call option, expect to absorb the majority of the entitys future
expected losses, and receive the entitys expected residual returns, PMC Commercial Trust is
considered to be the primary beneficiary. As a result, effective in January 2009, this subsidiary
was consolidated in our financial statements. The operations of the 2002 Joint Venture were
previously accounted for as retained interests in transferred assets. The following table
summarized the assets and liabilities of the 2002 Joint Venture (which represented a noncash
transaction with the exception of the restricted investments):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Loans receivable |
|
$ |
12,570 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
1,410 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
14,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured notes payable |
|
$ |
5,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
5,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, during the third quarter of 2009, we anticipate that PMC Joint Venture, L.P. 2003
(the 2003 Joint Venture) will reach its clean-up call option becoming a non-qualifying SPE.
Based on our current liquidity needs, the option will not be exercised. Since we expect to regain
control as a result of our clean-up call option, expect to absorb the majority of the entitys
future expected losses, and receive the entitys expected residual returns, PMC Commercial Trust
would be
considered the primary beneficiary. As a result, this subsidiary would be consolidated in our
third quarter 2009 financial statements.
7
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 2. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
FASB No. 165, Subsequent Events (FAS 165) was issued in June 2009. FAS 165 establishes general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but
before financial statements are issued. FAS 165 requires the disclosure of the date through which
an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. FAS 165 is effective for
financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted FAS 165 during the second quarter of
2009. See Note 1.
FASB No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No.
140 (FAS 166) was issued in June 2009. FAS 166 eliminates the concept of QSPEs for prospective
securitizations. In addition, disclosures related to transfers of financial assets were added.
FAS 166 is effective at the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009, for interim reports within that first annual reporting period and for interim
and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. We are currently
evaluating the impact of FAS 166 on our consolidated financial statements.
FASB No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FAS 167) was issued in June 2009.
FAS 167 requires an entity to perform an analysis to determine whether the entitys variable
interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This
analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the entity that has
both of the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable
interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (2) the
obligation to absorb the losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable
interest entity or the right to receive benefits from that entity that could potentially be
significant to the variable interest entity. FAS 167 is effective at the beginning of the first
annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim reports within that first
annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier
application is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact of FAS 167 on our consolidated
financial statements; however, it is anticipated that our off-balance sheet securitizations will be
consolidated beginning January 1, 2010. See Note 5 for information on our current off-balance
sheet securitizations.
Note. 3. Share-Based Compensation Plans:
We granted 15,000 option awards on June 13, 2009 at an exercise price of $8.35 (the closing price
on June 12, 2009). The fair value of this option award was estimated at the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Assumption |
|
|
|
|
Expected Term (years) |
|
|
3.0 |
|
Risk-Free Interest Rate |
|
|
1.91 |
% |
Expected Dividend Yield |
|
|
8.44 |
% |
Expected Volatility |
|
|
28.04 |
% |
Expected Forfeiture Rate |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that the options are
expected to be outstanding and was based on historical data. The risk-free rate was based on the
three-year U.S. Treasury rate corresponding to the expected term of the options. We used
historical information to determine our expected volatility and forfeiture rates. We recorded
compensation expense of approximately $11,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
related to this option grant. We granted 20,000 option awards on June 14, 2008 at an exercise
price of $7.65 (the closing price on June 13, 2008) and recorded compensation expense of
approximately $6,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
In addition, we issued an aggregate of 18,400 restricted shares to executive officers and our Board
of Trust Managers on June 13, 2009 at the then current market price of the shares of $8.35. We
issued an aggregate of 16,500 and 11,400 restricted shares to executive officers and our Board of
Trust Managers on June 14, 2008 and June 9, 2007, respectively, at the then current market price of
the shares. The restricted shares vest based on two years of continuous service with one-third of
the
shares vesting immediately upon issuance of the shares and one-third vesting at the end of each of
the next two years. Restricted share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change
in control (as defined in the plan).
8
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Compensation expense related to the restricted shares is being recognized over the vesting periods.
We recorded compensation expense of $72,000 and $65,000 during the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively, and $92,000 and $90,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively, related to restricted shares. As of June 30, 2009, there was approximately
$114,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted shares which will be
recognized over the next two years.
Note 4. Loans Receivable, net:
Loans receivable, net, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial mortgage loans (1) |
|
$ |
144,912 |
|
|
$ |
138,858 |
|
SBIC commercial mortgage loans (2) |
|
|
26,789 |
|
|
|
27,311 |
|
SBA 7(a) Program loans |
|
|
13,783 |
|
|
|
14,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable |
|
|
185,484 |
|
|
|
180,605 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred commitment fees, net |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(318 |
) |
Loan loss reserves |
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
184,415 |
|
|
$ |
179,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At June 30, 2009, includes approximately $11.3 million of loans held as collateral for the
outstanding structured notes of the 2002 Joint Venture. |
|
(2) |
|
Originated by our Small Business Investment Company (SBIC)
subsidiaries. |
The activity in our loan loss reserves was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Reduction of loan losses |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Principal balances written-off, net |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Impaired loans are defined by generally accepted accounting principles as loans for which it
is probable that the lender will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original
contractual terms of the loan. Information on those loans considered to be impaired loans was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Impaired loans requiring reserves |
|
$ |
3,621 |
|
|
$ |
2,492 |
|
Impaired loans expected to be fully recoverable |
|
|
4,642 |
|
|
|
2,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
8,263 |
|
|
$ |
4,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Average impaired loans |
|
$ |
6,456 |
|
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
|
$ |
7,582 |
|
|
$ |
2,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on impaired loans |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our recorded investment in non-accrual loans at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was
approximately $8.2 million and $5.1 million, respectively. We did not have any loans past due 90
days or more which were accruing interest at June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
Note 5. Retained Interests:
We own subordinated financial interests in several non-consolidated QSPEs (i.e., retained
interests in transferred assets (Retained Interests)). The QSPEs are PMC Capital, L.P.
1998-1 (the 1998 Partnership), PMC Joint Venture, L.P. 2000 (the 2000 Joint Venture) and
the 2003 Joint Venture created in connection with structured loan sale transactions. In our
structured loan sale transactions, we contributed loans receivable to a QSPE in exchange for
cash and beneficial interests in that entity. The QSPE issued notes payable (the Structured
Notes) to unaffiliated parties (Structured Noteholders).
10
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Information pertaining to our structured loan sale transactions as of June 30, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
Joint |
|
|
Joint |
|
|
|
Partnership |
|
|
Venture |
|
|
Venture |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Principal outstanding on sold loans |
|
$ |
6,229 |
|
|
$ |
24,633 |
|
|
$ |
20,656 |
|
Structured Notes balance outstanding |
|
$ |
7,451 |
|
|
$ |
16,463 |
|
|
$ |
10,374 |
|
Cash in the collection account |
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
Cash in the reserve account |
|
$ |
1,329 |
|
|
$ |
1,675 |
|
|
$ |
2,414 |
|
Weighted average interest rate of loans (1) |
|
P |
+1.70 |
% |
|
|
9.46 |
% |
|
|
L+4.02 |
% |
Interest rate on Structured Notes |
|
P |
-1.00 |
% |
|
|
7.28 |
% |
|
|
L+1.25 |
% |
Discount rate assumptions (2) |
|
5.3% to 14.9% |
|
8.6% to 14.9% |
|
5.4% to 15.0% |
Constant prepayment rate assumption (3) |
|
|
16.00 |
% |
|
|
12.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining life of Retained Interests (4) |
|
2.03 years |
|
1.55 years |
|
0.20 years |
Aggregate principal losses assumed (5) |
|
|
1.66 |
% |
|
|
1.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Aggregate principal losses to date (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Variable interest rates are denoted by the spread over the prime rate (P) or the 90-day
LIBOR (L). |
|
(2) |
|
Discount rates utilized were (a) 5.3% to 8.6% for our required overcollateralization, (b)
9.6% to 9.7% for our reserve funds and (c) 14.9% to 15.0% for our interest-only strip
receivables. |
|
(3) |
|
The prepayment rate was based on the actual performance of the loan pools, adjusted for
anticipated principal prepayments considering similar loans. |
|
(4) |
|
The weighted average remaining life of Retained Interests was calculated by summing the
product of (a) the sum of the principal collections expected in each future period multiplied
by (b) the number of periods until collection, and then dividing that total by (c) the
remaining principal balance. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents aggregate estimated future losses as a percentage of the principal outstanding
based upon per annum losses ranging from 0.0% to 1.0%. |
|
(6) |
|
Represents aggregate principal losses to date as a percentage of the principal outstanding at
inception. |
First Western SBLC, Inc. (First Western) has Retained Interests related to the sale of loans
originated pursuant to the Small Business Administrations (SBA) 7(a) Program. We expect the SBA
guaranteed portions of First Westerns loans to be sold to either dealers in government guaranteed
loans or institutional investors (Secondary Market Loan Sales) as the loans are fully funded. On
Secondary Market Loan Sales, we may retain an excess spread between the interest rate paid to us
from our borrowers and the rate we pay to the purchaser of the guaranteed portion of the note and
servicing costs. At June 30,
2009, the aggregate principal balance of First Westerns serviced loans on which we had an excess
spread was approximately $32.8 million and the weighted average excess spread was approximately
0.7%. In determining the fair value of our Retained Interests related to Secondary Market Loan
Sales, our assumptions at June 30, 2009 included a prepayment speed of 12% per annum and a discount
rate of 14.9%.
The components of our Retained Interests are the (1) required overcollateralization (the OC
piece), (2) reserve fund and the interest earned thereon and (3) interest-only strip receivable
(the IO Receivable).
11
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Our Retained Interests consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OC Piece |
|
|
Reserve Fund |
|
|
IO Receivable |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
First Western |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
$ |
496 |
|
1998 Partnership |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
2000 Joint Venture |
|
|
8,508 |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
10,297 |
|
|
|
9,850 |
|
2003 Joint Venture |
|
|
10,376 |
|
|
|
2,382 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
12,887 |
|
|
|
12,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,313 |
|
|
$ |
4,743 |
|
|
$ |
1,343 |
|
|
$ |
25,399 |
|
|
$ |
24,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OC Piece |
|
|
Reserve Fund |
|
|
IO Receivable |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
First Western |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
1998 Partnership |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
1,514 |
|
2000 Joint Venture |
|
|
8,372 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
10,068 |
|
|
|
9,834 |
|
2002 Joint Venture |
|
|
7,223 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
8,756 |
|
|
|
8,671 |
|
2003 Joint Venture |
|
|
10,397 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
12,501 |
|
|
|
12,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,435 |
|
|
$ |
5,660 |
|
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
33,248 |
|
|
$ |
32,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between the estimated fair value and cost of our Retained Interests is
reflected in our consolidated balance sheets as unrealized appreciation of Retained Interests.
The following sensitivity analysis of our Retained Interests as of June 30, 2009 highlights the
volatility that results when losses and discount rates are different than our assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Asset |
|
Changed Assumption |
|
Value |
|
|
Change (1) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Losses increase by 50 basis points per annum (2) |
|
$ |
25,206 |
|
|
$ |
(193 |
) |
Losses increase by 100 basis points per annum (2) |
|
$ |
24,999 |
|
|
$ |
(400 |
) |
Discount rates increase by 300 basis points |
|
$ |
24,639 |
|
|
$ |
(760 |
) |
Discount rates increase by 500 basis points |
|
$ |
24,159 |
|
|
$ |
(1,240 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Any depreciation of our Retained Interests is either included in the accompanying statement
of income as a permanent impairment or on our balance sheet in beneficiaries equity as an
unrealized loss. |
|
(2) |
|
If we experience losses in excess of anticipated losses, the effect on our Retained Interests
would first be to reduce the value of the IO receivables. To the extent the IO receivables
could not fully absorb the losses, the effect would then be to reduce the value of our reserve
funds and then the value of our OC pieces. |
Due to the short-term weighted average remaining life of our Retained Interests and the diminishing
value of our interest-only strip receivables, there is no material asset change for increases in
prepayment rates.
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. Values based on changes in
these assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated since the relationship of the change in an
assumption to the change in fair value is not linear. The effect of a variation in a particular
assumption on the fair value of our Retained Interests is calculated without changing any other
assumption. In reality, changes in one factor are not isolated from changes in another which might
magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
12
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Our consolidated financial statements do not include the assets, liabilities, partners capital,
revenues or expenses of the QSPEs. As a result, at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 our
consolidated balance sheets do not include $59.4 million and $77.6 million of assets, respectively,
and $34.4 million and $44.0 million of liabilities, respectively, related to our structured loan
sale transactions recorded by the QSPEs. At June 30, 2009, the partners capital of the QSPEs was
approximately $25.0 million and the estimated fair value and cost of the associated Retained
Interests was approximately $24.8 million and $24.1 million, respectively.
The annualized yield on our Retained Interests, which is comprised of the income earned less
permanent impairments, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Annualized yield |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
Note 6. Debt:
Information on our consolidated debt was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon Rate at |
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Face |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Range of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except footnotes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured notes and
debentures payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures |
|
$ |
8,190 |
|
|
$ |
8,171 |
|
|
$ |
8,190 |
|
|
$ |
8,168 |
|
|
|
2013 to 2015 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
Structured notes (1) |
|
|
5,257 |
|
|
|
5,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
6.67 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,447 |
|
|
|
13,428 |
|
|
|
8,190 |
|
|
|
8,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
2035 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
% |
|
|
7.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
23,800 |
|
|
|
23,800 |
|
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred
stock of subsidiary (2) |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
$ |
66,317 |
|
|
$ |
66,245 |
|
|
$ |
61,960 |
|
|
$ |
61,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents structured notes relating to the 2002 Joint Venture, consolidated beginning in
January 2009. Principal payments of these structured notes are dependent upon cash flows
received from the underlying loans. Our estimate of their repayment is based on scheduled
principal payments on the underlying loans. Our estimate will differ from actual amounts to
the extent we experience prepayments and/or loan losses. |
|
(2) |
|
During May 2009, we redeemed 20,000 shares of $100 par value, 4% cumulative preferred stock
of one of our SBICs held by the SBA due in September 2009. No gain or loss was recorded on
the redemption. |
13
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 7. Earnings Per Share:
The computations of basic earnings per common share are based on our weighted average shares
outstanding. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding was 10,548,000 and
10,767,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The weighted average
number of common shares outstanding was 10,599,000 and 10,766,000 during the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, no
shares were added to the weighted average shares outstanding for purposes of calculating diluted
earnings per share as
options were anti-dilutive.
Not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share were outstanding options to purchase
approximately 90,000 and 95,000 common shares during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively, because the options exercise prices were greater than the average market
price of the shares.
Note 8. Dividends Declared:
Dividends declared during 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Date Paid |
|
Record Date |
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 13, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
0.225 |
|
July 13, 2009 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
0.160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have certain covenants within our revolving credit facility which limit our ability to pay
out returns of capital as part of our dividends. These restrictions have not historically limited
the amount of dividends we have paid and management does not believe that they will restrict future
dividend payments.
Note 9. Share Repurchase Program:
Our Board of Trust Managers authorized a share repurchase program for up to $10.0 million for the
purchase of outstanding common shares which expires September 26, 2010. The common shares may be
purchased from time to time in the open market or pursuant to negotiated transactions.
Note 10. Income Taxes:
PMC Commercial has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). To qualify as a REIT, PMC Commercial must
meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we
distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our shareholders. As a REIT, PMC Commercial
generally will not be subject to corporate level Federal income tax on net income that is currently
distributed to shareholders. In order to meet our 2008 taxable income distribution requirements,
we will make an election under the Code to treat a portion of the distributions declared in 2009 as
distributions of 2008s REIT taxable income.
PMC Commercial has wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRSs) which are subject to Federal
income taxes. The income generated from the TRSs is taxed at normal corporate rates.
Note 11. Restructuring Costs:
In October 2008, due to economic and market conditions, we announced a number of cost reduction
initiatives. These initiatives included streamlining our sales, credit and servicing, as well as
outsourcing some functions. These changes resulted in one-time severance related charges of
approximately $1.8 million during 2008.
14
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The table below summarizes the balance of accrued severance and related benefits, which is included
in the balance of accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets, and the
changes in the accrued amounts as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,596 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(1,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accrued balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12. Fair Value Measurements:
At June 30, 2009, Retained Interests was our only asset that is required to be measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is
based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In
general, quoted market prices from active markets for the identical asset (Level 1 inputs),
if available, should be used to value an asset. If quoted prices are not available for the
identical asset, then a determination should be made if Level 2 inputs are available.
Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets in active markets or for identical
or similar assets in markets that are not active (i.e., markets in which there are few
transactions for the asset, the prices are not current, price quotations vary substantially,
or in which little information is released publicly). There is little or no market
information for our Retained Interests, thus there are no Level 1 or Level 2
determinations available. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset.
Unobservable inputs are used to measure fair value when observable inputs are not available.
These inputs include our expectations about the assumptions that market participants would use
in pricing the asset in a current transaction.
We use Level 3 inputs to determine the estimated fair value of our Retained Interests. The
following is activity for our Retained Interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
33,248 |
|
|
$ |
48,616 |
|
Principal collections |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(819 |
) |
Realized gains included in net income (1) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
Investments |
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
2,845 |
|
Permanent impairments |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
Repurchases/Consolidation (2) |
|
|
(8,565 |
) |
|
|
(15,856 |
) |
Accretion (3) |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
(844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value, end of period |
|
$ |
25,399 |
|
|
$ |
33,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost, end of period |
|
$ |
24,640 |
|
|
$ |
32,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included within income from Retained Interests. |
|
(2) |
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, represents the consolidation of the 2002 Joint
Venture. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, represents the repurchase of the 1999
Partnership and the consolidation of the 2001 Joint Venture. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents accretion of income in excess of principal collections, included within income
from Retained Interests. |
15
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
We may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These adjustments
to fair value usually result from loan loss reserves on individual loans. For financial and
nonfinancial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, the following table provides the carrying value of the related individual assets
at quarter end.
We use Level 3 inputs to determine the estimated fair value of our impaired loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
|
Carrying value at |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Impaired loans (1) |
|
$ |
7,961 |
|
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents carrying value and related provision for loan losses on loans for which
adjustments are based on the appraised value of the collateral, tax assessed value of the
collateral, and/or operating statistics. |
The estimated fair values of our financial and nonfinancial instruments were as follows at June 30,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
184,415 |
|
|
$ |
177,038 |
|
Retained Interests |
|
|
25,399 |
|
|
|
25,399 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
8,945 |
|
|
|
8,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured notes and debentures payable |
|
|
13,428 |
|
|
|
13,271 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiary |
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
23,800 |
|
|
|
23,800 |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
18,546 |
|
In general, estimates of fair value may differ from the carrying amounts of the financial
assets and liabilities primarily as a result of the effects of discounting future cash flows.
Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data and develop estimates of fair value.
Accordingly, the estimates presented may not be indicative of the amounts we could realize in a
current market exchange.
Loans receivable, net: Our loans receivable are recorded at cost and adjusted by net loan
origination fees and discounts. In order to determine the estimated fair value of our loans
receivable, we use a present value technique for the anticipated future cash flows using certain
assumptions including a current discount rate, prepayment tendencies and potential loan losses.
Reserves are established based on the creditors payment history, collateral value and other
factors. In the absence of a readily ascertainable market value, the estimated value of our loans
receivable may differ from the values that would be placed on the portfolio if a ready market for
the loans receivable existed.
Retained Interests: The assets are reflected in our consolidated financial statements at estimated
fair value based on valuation techniques as described in Note 5.
16
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Restricted investments and cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts are considered to be
reasonable estimates of fair value due to the short maturity of these funds.
Structured Notes and debentures payable, redeemable preferred stock of subsidiary and junior
subordinated notes: The estimated fair value is based on a present value calculation based on
prices of the same or similar instruments after considering market risks, current interest rates
and remaining maturities.
Revolving credit facility: The carrying amount is a reasonable estimation of fair value as the
interest rate on this instrument is variable and the short duration to maturity.
Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies:
Loan Commitments
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer provided the terms established in
the contract are met. Our outstanding loan commitments and approvals to fund loans were
approximately $19.3 million at June 30, 2009, the majority of which were for prime-based loans to
be originated by First Western, the government guaranteed portion of which may be sold pursuant to
Secondary Market Loan Sales. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates. Since some
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Operating Lease
We lease office space in Dallas, Texas under a lease which expires in October 2011. Future minimum
lease payments under this lease are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months |
|
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
208 |
|
2011 |
|
|
220 |
|
2012 |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreements
We have employment agreements with our executive officers for three-year terms expiring June 30,
2012. Under certain circumstances, as defined within the agreements, the agreements provide for
severance compensation to the executive officer in a lump sum payment in an amount equal to 2.99
times the average of the last three years annual compensation paid to the executive officer.
Structured Loan Sale Transactions
The documents of the structured loan sale transactions contain provisions (the Credit Enhancement
Provisions) that govern the assets and the inflow and outflow of funds of the entities originally
formed as part of the structured loan sale transactions. The Credit Enhancement Provisions include
specified limits on the delinquency rates on the loans included in each structured loan sale
transaction. If, at any measurement date, the delinquency rate with respect to any structured loan
sale transaction were to exceed the specified limits, the Credit Enhancement Provisions would
automatically increase the level of credit enhancement requirements for that structured loan sale
transaction. During the period in which the specified delinquency rate was exceeded, excess cash
flow from the entity, if any, which would otherwise be distributable to us, would be used to fund
the increased credit enhancement levels up to the principal amount of such loans and would delay or
reduce our distribution. In general, there can be no assurance that amounts deferred under Credit
Enhancement Provisions would be received in future periods or that future deferrals or losses will
not occur. As a result of delinquent and impaired loans in the 2002 Joint Venture and the 2003
Joint Venture, Credit Enhancement Provisions were triggered during the first quarter of 2009. As a
consequence, cash flows related to these transactions otherwise distributable to us were deferred
and utilized to fund the increased credit enhancement requirements. Based on current cash flow
assumptions, management anticipates that the funds from the 2002 Joint Venture will be received in
future periods. For the 2003 Joint Venture, management anticipates that the funds will be received
in future periods or used to repay the Structured Notes based on timing of attainment of the
clean-up call option.
17
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Litigation
We had significant outstanding claims against Arlington Hospitality, Inc.s and its subsidiary,
Arlington Inns, Inc.s (together Arlington) bankruptcy estates. Arlington objected to our claims
and initiated a complaint in the bankruptcy seeking, among other things, the return of payments
Arlington made pursuant to the property leases and the master lease agreement.
While confident that a substantial portion of our claims would have been allowed and the claims
against us would have been disallowed, due to the exorbitant cost of defense coupled with the
likelihood of reduced available assets in the debtors estates to pay claims, we executed an
agreement with Arlington to settle our claims against Arlington and Arlingtons claims against us.
The settlement provides that Arlington will dismiss its claims seeking the return of certain
payments made pursuant to the property leases and master lease agreement and substantially reduces
our claims against the Arlington estates. The settlement further provides for mutual releases
among the parties. The Bankruptcy Court approved the settlement. Accordingly, there are no
remaining assets or liabilities recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements
related to this matter. However, the settlement will only become final upon the Bankruptcy Courts
approval of Arlingtons liquidation plan which was filed during the third quarter of 2007. Due to
the complexity of the bankruptcy, we cannot estimate when, or if, the liquidation plan will be
approved.
In the normal course of business we are periodically party to certain legal actions and proceedings
involving matters that are generally incidental to our business (i.e., collection of loans
receivable). In managements opinion, the resolution of these legal actions and proceedings will
not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Other
If the SBA establishes that a loss on an SBA guaranteed loan is attributable to significant
technical deficiencies in the manner in which the loan was originated, funded or serviced by First
Western, the SBA may seek recovery of funds from us. With respect to the guaranteed portion of SBA
loans that have been sold, the SBA will first honor its guarantee and then seek compensation from
us in the event that a loss is deemed to be attributable to technical deficiencies.
18
ITEM 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are
intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. Such forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect, intend,
believe, anticipate, estimate, or continue, or the negative thereof or other variations or
similar words or phrases. These statements include the plans and objectives of management for
future operations, including, but not limited to, plans and objectives relating to future growth of
the loan portfolio and availability of funds. The forward-looking statements included herein are
based on current expectations and there can be no assurance that these expectations will be
attained. For a description of certain factors that could cause our future results to differ
materially from those expressed in any such forward-looking statement, see Recent Developments and
Trends That May Affect our Business. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with
respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future
business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of
which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and,
therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q
will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the
forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be
regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be
achieved. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. We do not undertake to update
them to reflect changes that occur after the date they are made.
The following discussion of our financial condition at June 30, 2009 and results of operations
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 should be read in conjunction with our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. For a more detailed description
of the risks affecting our financial condition and results of operations, see Risk Factors in
Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND TRENDS THAT MAY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS
The following provides an update of our recent developments and trends that may affect our
business included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 that may
have an impact on our financial condition and results of operations. The factors described below
could impact the volume of loan originations, the income we earn on our assets, our liquidity and
growth potential, the performance of our loans and/or the performance of the off-balance sheet
securitizations.
Economic Environment
In response to market disruptions, legislators and financial regulators implemented a number
of mechanisms designed to add stability and/or liquidity to the financial markets. The overall
effects of these and other legislative and regulatory efforts on the financial markets remains
uncertain. Should these initiatives fail, our business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects could be materially adversely affected.
Impact on us
In the short-term, we believe the current economic environment is complicated and risky and
will continue to present increasing challenges to us, our industry and the general economy. We
continue to believe our commercial lending business has strong long-term fundamentals. However,
due to the economic conditions, we have experienced, and continue to experience, the following:
|
|
|
Loan origination limitations; |
|
|
|
|
Reduced operating margins due to lack of economies of scale; |
|
|
|
|
Limited access to capital, and if such capital is available, at increased costs that
may be significant; |
|
|
|
|
An increase in non-performing and watch list loans; |
|
|
|
|
An increase in loan loss reserves; |
|
|
|
|
An inability to engage in structured loan transactions; and |
|
|
|
|
Reduced cash available for distribution to shareholders, particularly as our portfolio
yield is reduced primarily by lower variable interest rates and also by scheduled
maturities, prepayments and non-performing loans. |
19
At this time, we are uncertain as to how long the present economic environment will remain and
what shape it will take in the future. We are presently focusing on SBA 7(a) loans where we can
most efficiently utilize our present capital structure and liquidity.
Liquidity Overview
Our uncollateralized $45 million revolving credit facility (the Revolver) matures December
31, 2009. We are currently negotiating to extend the maturity date of the Revolver; however, the
credit markets remain extremely illiquid which may make it difficult and possibly cost prohibitive
to extend our Revolver. We believe that our Revolver will be extended until at least December 31,
2010. However, the aggregate amount available under our Revolver is expected to decrease and the
cost is expected to increase. We believe our current capital needs can be met by the anticipated
future availability under our Revolver. To the extent we need additional capital for unanticipated
items, there can be no assurance that we would be able to increase the amount available under our
Revolver or identify other sources of funds with acceptable terms. We have availability under our
Revolver; however, the amount available has caused us to significantly restrict non-SBA 7(a)
Program loan origination activity as discussed below. As a result, the majority of our outstanding
loan commitments are for SBA 7(a) Program loans.
Strategic Alternatives
The credit and capital market environment remains unstable so we continue to review and
analyze potential strategic and liquidity alternatives. While we continue to explore and evaluate
future opportunities as they present themselves, our primary focus is presently on maximizing the
value of our current investment portfolio and business strategy. Alternatives that we continue to
evaluate include the potential benefits that we could achieve through investment in, acquisition
of, or conversion to, a bank. There are significant obstacles in becoming a bank including legal,
regulatory and shareholder approvals. However, given current market conditions and valuations for
commercial mortgage REITs, we will continue to evaluate whether the benefits outweigh the risks.
Current Reliance on the SBA 7(a) Program
We are focusing on origination of SBA 7(a) Program loans which require less capital due to the
ability to sell the government guaranteed portion of such loans. We utilize the SBA 7(a) Program
to originate small business loans and then sell the government guaranteed portion to investors who
then bundle and sell those loans using the asset-backed securities market.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the Stimulus Bill) was passed in February 2009.
The Stimulus Bill contains provisions that benefit the SBA which may have a positive impact on our
lending operations. The Stimulus Bill provided the SBA with funding to eliminate fees on SBA 7(a)
Program loans and provided increased SBA guarantee percentages on SBA 7(a) Program loans of up to
90% for certain loans. These program changes are expected to be in effect for at least the
remainder of 2009.
We believe that it is promising that the activity on the secondary market has improved. The
market all but froze in the fourth quarter of 2008. In recent months, we have seen the secondary
market rebound and premiums paid steadily increase. However, while the premium levels have
increased, they are not back to the levels seen prior to the liquidity crisis. We believe our
liquidity has been, and will continue to be, benefitted through the increased activity in the
secondary market.
Cost Reduction Initiatives
In October 2008, due to economic and market conditions, we announced cost reduction
initiatives. These initiatives included streamlining our sales, credit and servicing, as well as
outsourcing some functions. Management estimates annual savings for these initiatives to be
approximately $1.2 million which will primarily be a reduction of salaries and related benefits on
our consolidated income statement.
20
Loan Portfolio Performance
Our aggregate portfolio continues to have minimal realized loan losses; however, we believe
that economic conditions have subjected our borrowers to financial stress. We have seen an
increase in payment delinquencies, slow pays, insufficient funds payments, late fees, non-payment
of real estate taxes and borrower requests for deferments of payment of principal and interest. Our
recorded investment in non-accrual loans increased from $5,062,000 (2.8% of our retained loans) at
December 31, 2008 to $8,236,000 (4.5% of our retained loans) at June 30, 2009. Additional changes
to the facts and circumstances of the individual borrowers, the limited service hospitality
industry and the economy may require the establishment of significant additional loan loss reserves
and the effect on our results of operations and financial condition may be material.
We are in the process of foreclosure proceedings on several properties, primarily limited
service hospitality properties, collateralizing our serviced loans. Historically, many borrowers
have brought their loans current; thus, we stopped the foreclosure process. It is difficult to
determine what impact the current market disruptions will have on our borrowers whose collateral is
in the process of foreclosure and the borrowers ability to become current on their loans. We
estimate that these foreclosure processes will be completed within the next eighteen months;
however, foreclosure is a complex and generally time consuming process that is subject to numerous
state laws and regulations.
Loan Activity
During the first six months of 2009 we funded approximately $7.8 million of loans. At June
30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, our outstanding commitments to fund loans were
approximately $19.3 million, $10.0 million and $13.2 million, respectively. Our pipeline has been
increasing and we anticipate that our fundings during 2009 will be between $20 million and $30
million. We have been concentrating on longer-term loan originations with real estate for
collateral and loan amounts between $500,000 and $2,000,000.
We had a significant amount of prepayments of our serviced loans from 2006 to 2008. The result
has been a reduction in our total serviced portfolio outstanding from its peak of approximately
$498 million during 2004 to approximately $270 million at June 30, 2009. Our prepayment activity
slowed during the last half of 2008 and the first half of 2009 and we expect that the amount of
prepayments will continue at these lower levels during the last half of 2009.
In addition to our retained portfolio of $185 million, at June 30, 2009, we service
approximately $85 million of aggregate principal balance remaining on loans that were sold in
structured loan sale transactions and Secondary Market Loan Sales. Since we retain a residual
interest in the cash flows from these sold loans, the performance of these loans impacts our
profitability and our cash available for dividend distributions. Therefore, we provide information
on both our loans retained (the Retained Portfolio) and combined with sold loans that we service
(the Serviced Portfolio).
Information on our Serviced Portfolio, including prepayment trends, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Serviced Portfolio (1) |
|
$ |
270,317 |
|
|
$ |
275,530 |
|
|
$ |
326,368 |
|
|
$ |
397,567 |
|
|
$ |
447,220 |
|
|
$ |
468,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans funded |
|
$ |
7,802 |
|
|
$ |
34,587 |
|
|
$ |
33,756 |
|
|
$ |
51,686 |
|
|
$ |
49,942 |
|
|
$ |
49,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayments (2) |
|
$ |
6,411 |
|
|
$ |
68,556 |
|
|
$ |
84,137 |
|
|
$ |
91,710 |
|
|
$ |
41,049 |
|
|
$ |
15,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Prepayments (3) (4) |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Serviced Portfolio outstanding before loan loss reserves and deferred commitment
fees. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include balloon maturities of SBA 504 program loans. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents prepayments as a percentage of the Serviced Portfolio outstanding as of
the beginning of the applicable year. |
|
(4) |
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, represents annualized prepayments as a
percentage of our Serviced Portfolio outstanding. |
21
LOAN PORTFOLIO INFORMATION AND STATISTICS
Loan Portfolio Rollforward
Loans originated and principal repayments on our Retained Portfolio were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Loans Originated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Funded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA 7(a) Program loans |
|
$ |
7,802 |
|
|
$ |
19,739 |
|
|
$ |
4,266 |
|
|
$ |
6,299 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,737 |
|
SBA 504 program loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans funded |
|
|
7,802 |
|
|
|
28,104 |
|
|
|
4,266 |
|
|
|
10,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Loan Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Joint Venture |
|
|
12,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 Joint Venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,760 |
|
1999 Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans originated |
|
$ |
20,372 |
|
|
$ |
49,467 |
|
|
$ |
4,266 |
|
|
$ |
32,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Repayments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of SBA 7(a) guaranteed loans |
|
$ |
7,677 |
|
|
$ |
1,856 |
|
|
$ |
6,894 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
Prepayments |
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
16,479 |
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
7,523 |
|
Scheduled principal payments |
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
Balloon maturities of SBA 504 program loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal repayments |
|
$ |
15,218 |
|
|
$ |
22,517 |
|
|
$ |
12,606 |
|
|
$ |
11,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate and Yield Information
Interest rate and yield information on our Retained Portfolio were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average contractual interest rate |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized average yield (1) (2) |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In addition to interest income, the annualized average yield includes all fees
earned and is adjusted by the provision for (reduction of) loan losses, net. |
|
(2) |
|
For the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the year ended December
31, 2008. |
The LIBOR and the prime rate used in determining interest rates to be charged to our borrowers
during the third quarter of 2009 (set on July 1, 2009) is 0.60% and 3.25%, respectively, while the
LIBOR and prime rate charged during the second quarter of 2009 (set on April 1, 2009) was 1.21% and
3.25%, respectively. To the extent LIBOR or the prime rate changes, we will have changes in
interest income from our variable-rate loans.
22
We have $116.3 million of loans based on LIBOR and $27.1 million of debt based on LIBOR. On
the net difference of $89.2 million, LIBOR reductions will have a negative impact on future
earnings. Effective in the third quarter of 2009, we experienced a reduction in the LIBOR base
rate charged on our loans (a decrease of approximately 60 basis points) which will cause a
reduction in our net interest income, assuming no change in our LIBOR based loans or debt, of
approximately $535,000 on an annual basis or approximately $134,000 to our third quarter 2009 net
interest income. Since LIBOR has already been reduced to historically low levels, further
significant negative impacts from lower LIBOR interest rates is not anticipated.
The weighted average contractual interest rate on our Serviced Portfolio was 6.2%, 7.9% and
7.3% at June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively.
Retained Portfolio Breakdown
Our Retained Portfolio was comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Retained Portfolio |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Retained Portfolio |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Variable-rate LIBOR |
|
$ |
116,281 |
|
|
|
63.1 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
$ |
123,081 |
|
|
|
68.4 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
Fixed-rate (1) |
|
|
50,892 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
39,297 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
Variable-rate prime |
|
|
17,242 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
17,429 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
184,415 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
$ |
179,807 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At June 30, 2009, includes approximately $11.3 million of loans from the 2002 Joint
Venture. |
Impaired Loan Data
Senior management closely monitors our impaired loans which are classified into two
categories: Problem Loans and Special Mention Loans (together, Impaired Loans). Our Problem
Loans are loans which are not complying with their contractual terms, the collection of the balance
of the principal is considered unlikely and on which the fair value of the collateral is less than
the remaining unamortized principal balance. Our Special Mention Loans are those loans that are
either not complying or had previously not complied with their contractual terms but, in general,
we expect a full recovery of the principal balance through either collection efforts or liquidation
of collateral.
23
Our Impaired Loans were as follows (balances represent our investment in the loans prior to
loan loss reserves and deferred commitment fees):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Problem Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
$ |
3,707 |
|
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
Sold loans of QSPEs (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,707 |
|
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
$ |
4,642 |
|
|
$ |
9,294 |
|
Sold loans of QSPEs (1) |
|
|
2,784 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,426 |
|
|
$ |
10,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Problem Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Sold loans of QSPEs (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Special Mention Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Sold loans of QSPEs (1) |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We do not include the remaining outstanding principal of serviced loans pertaining to
the government guaranteed portion of SBA 7(a) Program loans sold into the secondary
market since the SBA has guaranteed payment of principal on these loans. |
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had reserves of $672,000 and $480,000,
respectively. Our provision for loan losses (excluding reductions of loan losses) as a percentage
of our weighted average outstanding loans receivable was 0.14% and 0.02% during the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. To the extent one or several of our loans experience
significant operating difficulties and we are forced to liquidate the loans, future losses may be
substantial.
We may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These adjustments
to fair value usually result from loan loss reserves on individual loans. We use Level 3 inputs
to determine the estimated fair value of our Impaired Loans. Adjustments to the carrying value of
Impaired Loans are generally based on the appraised value of the collateral, tax assessed value of
the collateral and/or operating statistics.
RETAINED INTERESTS
At June 30, 2009, Retained Interests was our only asset that is required to be measured at
fair value on a recurring basis. There is little or no market information for our Retained
Interests, thus there are no Level 1 or Level 2 determinations available. Level 3 inputs are
unobservable inputs for the asset. Unobservable inputs are used to measure fair value when
observable inputs are not available. These inputs include our expectations about the assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing the asset in a current transaction. Due to the
limited number of entities that conduct structured loan sale transactions with similar assets, the
relatively small size of our Retained Interests and the limited number of buyers for such assets,
no readily ascertainable market exists for our Retained Interests. Therefore, we utilize our own
data and assumptions to determine the value of our Retained Interests, in conjunction with our
knowledge of similar markets for our type of Retained Interests. Based on these factors, our
estimate of fair value may vary significantly from what a willing buyer would pay for these assets.
The estimated fair value of our Retained Interests is determined based on the present value of
estimated future cash flows from the QSPEs. This valuation is dependent upon estimates of future
cash flows that are based on the performance of the underlying loans and estimates of discount
rates. Prepayments or losses in excess of estimates may cause unrealized depreciation and
potentially impairments. The estimated future cash flows are calculated based on assumptions
including, among other things, prepayment speeds and loan losses. We regularly measure loan loss
and prepayment assumptions against the actual performance of the loans sold and to the extent
adjustments to our assumptions are deemed necessary, they are made on a quarterly basis.
24
As a result of the lack of available market inputs, at the time our securitization
transactions were completed and for each quarterly valuation update, we utilized a cash flow model
to determine the estimated fair value of our Retained Interests. The turmoil in the credit markets
has spotlighted the use of cash flow models and management has evaluated the complexities and range
of judgments inherent in using cash flow models. As such, we continue to reevaluate our discount
rates, future prepayments and loan losses on the underlying securitized loans quarterly using best
available information in light of the current illiquid markets.
The discount rates utilized in computing the net present value of future cash flows are based
on an estimate of the inherent risk associated with each cash flow stream (i.e., interest-only
strip receivable, reserve funds and overcollateralized piece). Although we believe these estimates
of discount rates are reasonable estimates of the market rate, purchasers of these types of
investments may utilize different discount rates in determining their value of the estimated future
cash flows considering the current market illiquidity.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
3,872 |
|
|
$ |
6,214 |
|
|
$ |
(2,342 |
) |
|
|
(37.7 |
%) |
Total expenses |
|
$ |
2,396 |
|
|
$ |
3,018 |
|
|
$ |
(622 |
) |
|
|
(20.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1,544 |
|
|
$ |
3,105 |
|
|
$ |
(1,561 |
) |
|
|
(50.3 |
%) |
Net income |
|
$ |
1,564 |
|
|
$ |
3,529 |
|
|
$ |
(1,965 |
) |
|
|
(55.7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
(48.3 |
%) |
Net income |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
(54.5 |
%) |
Net income decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to:
|
|
|
A decrease in income from Retained Interests of $1,496,000 due primarily to a
reduction in our weighted average Retained Interests of 38% and a decrease in
unanticipated prepayment fees of $900,000. The 2002 Joint Venture (previously an
off-balance sheet entity which was included in Retained Interests), was consolidated
beginning January 2009; |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in interest income of $734,000 due primarily to declining variable
interest rates; and |
|
|
|
|
An increase in provision for (reduction of) loan losses, net, of $117,000 due
primarily to devaluation of the collateral underlying certain of our loans. |
25
The above reductions in net income were partially offset by:
|
|
|
A decrease in interest expense of $187,000 due primarily to declining variable
interest rates; and |
|
|
|
A reduction in overhead (salaries and related benefits and general and
administrative expenses) of $473,000 due primarily to our 2008 cost reduction
initiatives. |
We anticipate that the 2003 Joint Venture will reach its clean-up call option during the
third quarter of 2009 and be consolidated in our financial statements. At June 30, 2009, the 2003
Joint Venture had loans of $20.7 million, structured notes of $10.4 million and restricted
investments of $2.6 million.
More detailed comparative information on the composition of and changes in our revenues and
expenses is provided below.
Revenues
Interest income consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest income loans |
|
$ |
2,733 |
|
|
$ |
3,318 |
|
Accretion of loan fees and discounts |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Interest income idle funds |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,785 |
|
|
$ |
3,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in interest income loans was primarily attributable to decreases in variable
interest rates partially offset by an increase in our weighted average loans receivable
outstanding. Our weighted average loans receivable outstanding increased to approximately $188.0
million during the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $179.8 million during the three months
ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to the consolidation of loans previously included in an
off-balance sheet entity during January 2009. At June 30, 2009, approximately 72% of our loans had
variable interest rates. The base LIBOR charged to our borrowers decreased from 2.70% during the
three months ended June 30, 2008 to 1.21% during the three months ended June 30, 2009. The base
prime rate charged to our borrowers decreased from 5.25% during the three months ended June 30,
2008 to 3.25% during the three months ended June 30, 2009. To the extent these rates decline, they
will have a negative impact on our earnings. In addition, primarily due to the weakened economy
and recession, our non-accrual loans have increased. Non-accrual loans increased to $8.2 million
at June 30, 2009 from $0.2 million at June 30, 2008.
Income from Retained Interests decreased $1,496,000 primarily due to a decrease in the
weighted average balance of our Retained Interests outstanding of $15.6 million to $25.1 million
during the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $40.7 million during the three months ended
June 30, 2008 due primarily to the attainment of the clean-up call provision on the 2002 Joint
Venture. In addition, there was a decrease in unanticipated prepayment fees of $900,000. The
yield on our Retained Interests, which is comprised of the income earned less permanent
impairments, decreased to 12.1% during the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 15.3%
during the three months ended June 30, 2008. Our income and yield from Retained Interests will
continue to decline (1) as scheduled principal payments and prepayments of the sold loans of our
QSPEs occur and/or (2) additional clean-up call options are attained. We anticipate that the
2003 Joint Venture will attain its clean-up call option during the third quarter of 2009.
26
Other income consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Servicing income |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
Loan related income other |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Premium income |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Prepayment fees |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Equity in earnings |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Other |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We earn fees for servicing all loans held by the QSPEs and loans sold into the secondary
market. As these fees are based on the principal balance of sold loans outstanding, they will
decrease over time as scheduled principal payments and prepayments occur and/or clean-up calls
are attained and increase as SBA 7(a) Program loans are sold into the secondary market.
We saw high levels of prepayment activity during the first half of 2008; however, our
prepayment activity slowed during the last half of 2008 and the first half of 2009. We anticipate
that the amount of prepayments will continue at relatively low levels during the remainder of 2009.
Prepayment fee income is dependent upon a number of factors and is not generally predictable as
the mix and amount of loans prepaying is not known.
Premium income results from the sale of the government guaranteed portion of SBA 7(a) Program
loans into the secondary market. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we sold
approximately $6.9 million (guaranteed portion) of SBA 7(a) Program loans into the secondary market
and collected cash premiums of approximately $170,000. Premium income will not equal collected
cash premiums because (1) premium income represents the difference between the relative fair value
attributable to the sale of the guaranteed portion of the loan and the principal balance (cost) of
the loan adjusted by costs of origination and (2) the guaranteed portions of some loans were sold
for future servicing instead of up-front cash premiums.
Interest Expense
Interest expense consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
407 |
|
Revolver |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Debentures payable |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Structured notes |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Conduit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
Other |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
$ |
977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average cost of our funds for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was 4.1% compared
to 5.3% during the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Interest expense on the junior subordinated notes
decreased as a result of decreases in variable interest rates. Interest expense on our Revolver
has increased due primarily to an increase in the weighted average borrowings under the Revolver
from $18.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 to $24.6 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2009 partially offset by a decrease in the weighted average interest rate
from 4.21% during the three months ended June 30, 2008 to 2.50% during the three months ended June
30, 2009. The conduit facility matured on May 2, 2008 and was repaid using proceeds from our
Revolver. During May 2009, we redeemed 20,000 shares of $100 par value, 4% cumulative preferred
stock of one of our SBICs held by the SBA due in September 2009. No gain or loss was recorded on
the redemption.
27
Other Expenses
Our salaries and related benefits expense decreased $353,000 during the three months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008 due primarily to our reduction in
workforce in October 2008. Management estimates annual savings from the cost reduction initiatives
to be approximately $1.2 million which will primarily be a reduction of salaries and related
benefits.
Permanent impairments on Retained Interests (write-downs of the value of our Retained
Interests) were $17,000 and $96,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, resulting primarily from reductions in future expected cash flows due to decreased
actual prepayments and a reduction in idle funds interest.
Provision for (reduction of) loan losses, net, increased to $56,000 during the three months
ended June 30, 2009 from ($61,000) during the three months ended June 30, 2008. Beginning December
31, 2008, our provision for loan losses is comprised of specific and general reserves. Our
specific reserves increased from $205,000 at December 31, 2008 to $397,000 at June 30, 2009 due
primarily to devaluations of collateral of limited service hospitality properties.
Income tax benefit (provision) was a provision of $91,000 during the three months ended June
30, 2008 compared to a benefit of $68,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2009 due primarily
to (1) reduced earnings of one of the taxable REIT subsidiaries and (2) a deferred benefit
resulting from sales of loans of our SBA subsidiary.
Discontinued Operations
We recorded gains on sales of real estate of $20,000 and $424,000 during the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, due to income recognition on previously unrecognized
deferred gains. Our remaining deferred gains total $1,358,000 at June 30, 2009. Deferred gains
are recorded to income as principal is received on the related loans receivable until the required
amount of cash proceeds are obtained from the purchaser to qualify for full accrual gain treatment.
We currently anticipate, assuming timely collection of standard principal and interest payments,
that approximately $660,000 of this deferred gain will be recognized during the third and/or fourth
quarters of 2009.
28
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
7,863 |
|
|
$ |
12,636 |
|
|
$ |
(4,773 |
) |
|
|
(37.8 |
%) |
Total expenses |
|
$ |
4,773 |
|
|
$ |
6,313 |
|
|
$ |
(1,540 |
) |
|
|
(24.4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
3,140 |
|
|
$ |
6,150 |
|
|
$ |
(3,010 |
) |
|
|
(48.9 |
%) |
Net income |
|
$ |
3,190 |
|
|
$ |
6,912 |
|
|
$ |
(3,722 |
) |
|
|
(53.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
(47.4 |
%) |
Net income |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
(0.34 |
) |
|
|
(53.1 |
%) |
Net income decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to:
|
|
|
A decrease in income from Retained Interests of $2,499,000 due primarily to a
reduction in our weighted average Retained Interests of 44% and a decrease in
unanticipated prepayment fees of $1,313,000. The 2002 Joint Venture (previously an
off-balance sheet entity which was included in Retained Interests), was consolidated
beginning in January 2009; |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in interest income of $1,649,000 due primarily to declining variable
interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in other income of $625,000 due primarily to a reduction in prepayment
fees; and |
|
|
|
|
An increase in provision for loan losses, net, of $191,000 due primarily to
devaluations of collateral underlying certain of our loans. |
|
|
The above reductions in net income were partially offset by: |
|
|
|
A decrease in interest expense of $614,000 due primarily to declining variable
interest rates; and |
|
|
|
|
A reduction in overhead (salaries and related benefits and general and
administrative expenses) of $817,000 due primarily to our 2008 cost reduction
initiatives. |
We anticipate that the 2003 Joint Venture will reach its clean-up call option during the
third quarter of 2009 and be consolidated in our financial statements. At June 30, 2009, the 2003
Joint Venture had loans of $20.7 million, structured notes of $10.4 million and restricted
investments of $2.6 million.
More detailed comparative information on the composition of and changes in our revenues and
expenses is provided below.
29
Revenues
Interest income consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest income loans |
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
6,919 |
|
Accretion of loan fees and discounts |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Interest income idle funds |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,636 |
|
|
$ |
7,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in interest income loans was primarily attributable to decreases in variable
interest rates partially offset by an increase in our weighted average loans receivable
outstanding. Our weighted average loans receivable outstanding increased to approximately $188.4
million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $175.2 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2008 primarily due to the consolidation of loans previously included in an off-balance
sheet entity during January 2009. At June 30, 2009, approximately 72% of our loans had variable
interest rates. The average base LIBOR charged to our borrowers decreased from 3.71% during the
six months ended June 30, 2008 to 1.32% during the six months ended June 30, 2009. To the extent
these rates decline, they will have a negative impact on our earnings. In addition, primarily due
to the weakened economy and recession, our non-accrual loans have increased. Non-accrual loans
increased to $8.2 million at June 30, 2009 from $0.2 million at June 30, 2008. The decrease in our
idle funds interest income is primarily due to a decrease in money market rates earned on cash and
cash equivalents of our SBICs. These funds can only be used for commitments of the SBICs.
Income from Retained Interests decreased $2,499,000 primarily due to a decrease in the
weighted average balance of our Retained Interests outstanding of $19.6 million to $24.9 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $44.5 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2008 due primarily to the attainment of the clean-up call provision on the 2002 Joint
Venture. In addition, there was a decrease in unanticipated prepayment fees of $1,313,000. The
yield on our Retained Interests, which is comprised of the income earned less permanent
impairments, decreased to 11.7% during the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 14.5% during
the six months ended June 30, 2008. Our income and yield from Retained Interests will continue to
decline (1) as scheduled principal payments and prepayments of the sold loans of our QSPEs occur
and/or (2) additional clean-up call options are attained. We anticipate that the 2003 Joint
Venture will attain its clean-up call option during the third quarter of 2009.
Other income consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Servicing income |
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
Loan related income other |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Premium income |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Equity in earnings |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Prepayment fees |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Other |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
530 |
|
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We earn fees for servicing all loans held by the QSPEs and loans sold into the secondary
market. As these fees are based on the principal balance of sold loans outstanding, they will
decrease over time as scheduled principal payments and prepayments occur and/or clean-up calls
are attained and increase as SBA 7(a) Program loans are sold into the secondary market.
We saw high levels of prepayment activity during the first half of 2008; however, our
prepayment activity slowed during the last half of 2008 and the first half of 2009. We anticipate
that the amount of prepayments will continue at relatively low levels during the remainder of 2009.
Prepayment fee income is dependent upon a number of factors and is not generally predictable as
the mix and amount of loans prepaying is not known.
30
Premium income results from the sale of the government guaranteed portion of SBA 7(a) Program
loans into the secondary market. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we sold approximately
$7.7 million (guaranteed portion) of SBA 7(a) Program loans into the secondary market and collected
cash premiums of approximately $212,000. Premium income will not equal collected cash premiums
because (1) premium income represents the difference between the relative fair value attributable
to the sale of the guaranteed portion of the loan and the principal balance (cost) of the loan
adjusted by costs of origination and (2) the guaranteed portions of some loans were sold for future
servicing instead of up-front cash premiums.
Interest Expense
Interest expense consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
$ |
628 |
|
|
$ |
967 |
|
Revolver |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
Debentures payable |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Structured notes |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Conduit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
Other |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,596 |
|
|
$ |
2,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average cost of our funds for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was 4.1%
compared to 5.3% during the six months ended June 30, 2008. Interest expense on the junior
subordinated notes decreased as a result of decreases in variable interest rates. Interest expense
on our Revolver increased due primarily to an increase in the weighted average borrowings under the
Revolver from $11.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 to $26.0 million during the
six months ended June 30, 2009 partially offset by a decrease in the weighted average interest rate
from 4.33% during the six months ended June 30, 2008 to 2.50% during the three months ended June
30, 2009. The conduit facility matured on May 2, 2008 and was repaid using proceeds from our
Revolver. During May 2009, we redeemed 20,000 shares of $100 par value, 4% cumulative preferred
stock of one of our SBICs held by the SBA due in September 2009. No gain or loss was recorded on
the redemption.
Other Expenses
Our salaries and related benefits expense decreased $671,000 during the six months ended June
30, 2009 from the six months ended June 30, 2008 due primarily to our reduction in workforce in
October 2008. Management estimates annual savings from the cost reduction initiatives to be
approximately $1.2 million which will primarily be a reduction of salaries and related benefits.
Permanent impairments on Retained Interests (write-downs of the value of our Retained
Interests) were $77,000 and $377,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
resulting primarily from reductions in future expected cash flows due to decreased actual
prepayments and a reduction in idle funds interest.
Provision for loan losses, net, increased to $203,000 during the six months ended June 30,
2009 from $12,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2008. Beginning December 31, 2008, our
provision for loan losses is comprised of specific and general reserves. Our specific reserves
increased from $205,000 at December 31, 2008 to $397,000 at June 30, 2009 due primarily to
devaluations of collateral of limited service hospitality properties.
31
Income tax benefit (provision) was a provision of $173,000 during the six months ended June
30, 2008 compared to a benefit of $50,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2009 due primarily
to (1) reduced earnings of one of the taxable REIT subsidiaries and (2) a deferred benefit
resulting from sales of loans of our SBA subsidiary.
Discontinued Operations
We recorded gains on sales of real estate of $50,000 and $762,000 during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, due to income recognition on previously unrecognized deferred
gains. Our remaining deferred gains total $1,358,000 at June 30, 2009. Deferred gains are
recorded to income as principal is received on the related loans receivable until the required
amount of cash proceeds are obtained from the purchaser to qualify for full accrual gain treatment.
We currently anticipate, assuming timely collection of standard principal and interest payments,
that approximately $660,000 of this deferred gain will be recognized during the third and/or fourth
quarters of 2009.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flow Analysis
Information on our cash flow was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
2,163 |
|
|
$ |
4,881 |
|
|
$ |
(2,718 |
) |
Cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
$ |
4,707 |
|
|
$ |
(4,944 |
) |
|
$ |
9,651 |
|
Cash used in financing
activities |
|
$ |
(8,531 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,734 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,797 |
) |
Operating Activities
The reduction in cash provided by operating activities was primarily caused by (1) reduced net
income, (2) payment of accounts payable and accrued expenses, including severance payments of
approximately $1.4 million, and (3) disbursement of borrower advances offset by an increase in
proceeds from sale of guaranteed loans net of loans funded, held for sale.
Our net cash flow from operating activities is primarily used to fund our dividends. Our
modified cash available for dividend distributions (Modified Cash), as reconciled below, is
defined as cash from operating activities before (1) the change in operating assets and liabilities
and (2) loans funded, held for sale, net of proceeds from sale of guaranteed loans (Operating Loan
Activity). To the extent Modified Cash does not cover the current dividend distribution rate or
if additional cash is needed based on our working capital needs, the Board of Trust Managers may
choose to modify its current dividend policy. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, dividend
distributions were greater than our Modified Cash by
$3,037,000. This was primarily caused by REIT taxable income timing differences (i.e., severance
payments, etc.) combined with the declaration of $1.5 million in a special dividend paid in the
first quarter of 2009 that related to 2008. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, dividend
distributions were less than our Modified Cash by $1,041,000. Management anticipates that our
dividend distributions during 2009 will be greater than our Modified Cash with any shortfall being
funded using our revolving credit facility.
32
The following reconciles net cash flow from operating activities to Modified Cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities |
|
$ |
2,163 |
|
|
$ |
4,881 |
|
Change in operating assets and
liabilities |
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Operating Loan Activity |
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modified Cash |
|
$ |
3,258 |
|
|
$ |
6,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the primary source of funds was principal collected
on loans, net of loans funded of $6,193,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, our
primary use of funds was loans funded, net of principal collected on loans of $4,039,000 and
investment in Retained Interests, net of principal collected on Retained Interests of $2,002,000.
Principal collected on Retained Interests declined from $818,000 during the six months ended June
30, 2008 to $143,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2009. We anticipate that the principal
collected on our Retained Interests will continue to decline based on payoffs and paydowns of
outstanding principal and attainment of clean-up calls.
Financing Activities
We used funds in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
primarily to pay dividends of $6,295,000 and $5,384,000, respectively. In addition, during the six
months ended June 30, 2009, we redeemed $2,000,000 of redeemable preferred stock of subsidiary due
in September 2009 and repurchased common shares under our share repurchase plan for $1,076,000.
Sources and Uses of Funds
Liquidity Summary
Our primary sources of funds to meet our short-term liquidity needs, including working
capital, dividends, debt service and additional investments, if any, consist of (1) cash flow from
operations, (2) proceeds from principal and interest payments, including prepayments and if
applicable, prepayments fees, on our unrestricted investments, (3) borrowings under our Revolver
and (4) Secondary Market Loan Sales. We believe these sources of funds will be sufficient to meet
our liquidity requirements for at least the next twelve months. To a lesser extent, and to the
extent available to us, we may utilize
(1) proceeds from potential loan and asset sales, (2) new financings or additional securitization
offerings and (3) proceeds from potential common or preferred equity offerings.
Due to continued market turbulence, we do not anticipate having the ability in the next six
months to access debt capital through alternative or increased warehouse lines, new securitization
issuances or new trust preferred issuances. We continue to explore ways to extend or refinance our
current Revolver; however, in the event we are not able to successfully secure alternative or
extended financing, we will rely on cash flows from operations, principal payments (including
prepayments) on our investments, and (if necessary) proceeds from asset and loan sales to satisfy
our working capital needs. We are in discussions with our bank to extend our current Revolver.
Based on these discussions, management believes it is likely that we will be able to extend our
facility through December 31, 2010. However, we anticipate that the aggregate availability under
our Revolver will be reduced and its costs, including any up-front costs and ongoing interest
expense and/or unused fees will increase. Based on our current anticipated cash needs, it appears
that this possible reduction in availability under the Revolver will not have an impact on our
ability to originate our projected SBA 7(a) Program loan volume. If we are unable to (1) renew,
replace or expand our sources of financing, (2) execute asset and loan sales in a timely manner or
to receive anticipated proceeds therefrom or (3) fully utilize available cash of our SBICs, it may
have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and ability to make dividends to our
shareholders.
33
If we are unable to make required payments under our borrowings, breach any representation or
warranty of our borrowings or violate any covenant, our lenders may accelerate the maturity of our
debt or require us to pledge collateral. At June 30, 2009, PMC Commercial Trust has over $133
million of unencumbered loans. In addition, PMC Commercial Trust has equity in its off-balance
sheet securitizations and investments in its on-balance sheet subsidiaries. To the extent
necessary, management believes that these assets would provide sufficient liquidity, if needed, to
satisfy any required payment on our Revolver. If we are unable to repay our borrowings we may need
to prematurely sell assets or lenders could force us to take other actions. Any such event may
have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, the value of our common shares and the ability to
pay dividends to our shareholders.
Sources of Funds
In general, we require liquidity to originate new loans and repay debt principal and interest.
Our operating revenues are typically utilized to pay our operating expenses and dividends. We
have been utilizing principal collections on existing loans and Retained Interests and borrowings
under our Revolver as our primary sources of funds. In addition, historically we utilized a
combination of the following sources to generate funds:
|
|
|
Structured loan financings or sales; |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of SBA debentures; |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of junior subordinated notes; and/or |
|
|
|
|
Common equity issuance. |
As discussed previously, these markets (with the possible exception of SBA debentures) are not
available at the present time and there can be no assurance that they will be available in the
future. At our current share price, we do not intend to issue common shares. Since 2004, our
working capital has been provided through credit facilities and the issuance of junior subordinated
notes. Prior to 2004, our primary source of long-term funds was structured loan sale transactions.
At the current time, there is no market for commercial loan asset-backed securitizations. We
cannot anticipate when, or if, this market will be available in the future. Until this market
becomes available or we implement a strategic alternative, our ability to grow is limited.
Our Revolver matures December 31, 2009. As discussed above, we are currently negotiating to
extend the maturity date of our Revolver; however, the credit markets remain extremely illiquid
which may make it difficult and possibly cost prohibitive to extend our Revolver. We believe that
our capital needs during the next six months can be met by our Revolver and cash on hand. To the
extent we need additional capital for unanticipated items, there can be no assurance that we would
be able to increase the amount available under our Revolver or identify other sources of funds at
an acceptable cost, if at all. The limited amount of capital available to originate new loans has
caused us to significantly restrict non-SBA 7(a) Program loan origination activity. In addition, a
reduction in the availability of the above sources of funds could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations. If these sources, including extension of our
Revolver when it matures in December 2009, are not available in the future, we may have to
originate loans at further reduced levels or sell assets, potentially on unfavorable terms.
We continue to have a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.5:1 at June 30, 2009. This ratio is well
below that of typical specialty commercial finance companies.
As a REIT, we must distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to
maintain our tax status under the Code. Accordingly, to the extent the sources above represent
taxable income, such amounts have historically been distributed to our shareholders. In general,
should we receive less cash from our portfolio of investments, we can lower the dividend so as not
to cause any material cash shortfall. During 2009, we anticipate that our cash flows from
operating activities will be utilized to fund our expected 2009 dividend distributions and
generally will not be available to fund portfolio growth or for the repayment of principal due on
our debt.
At June 30, 2009, we had availability of $21.2 million under our Revolver. We are charged
interest on the balance outstanding under our revolver at our election of either the prime rate of
the lender less 75 basis points or 162.5 basis points over either the 30 or 90-day LIBOR. We are
charged an unused fee equal to 37.5 basis points computed based on our daily available balance.
The Revolver requires us to meet certain covenants, the most restrictive of which provides for an
asset coverage test, as defined, based on our cash and cash equivalents, loans receivable and
Retained Interests as a ratio to our senior debt, limits our ability to pay out returns of capital
as part of our dividends and provides for a maximum amount of problem loans, as defined, as a
percentage of equity. We also have minimum equity requirements. At June 30, 2009, we were in
compliance with the covenants of this facility.
34
Uses of Funds
Currently, the primary use of our funds is to originate loans and for repayment of the
principal balance of our Revolver. Our outstanding commitments to fund new loans were $19.3
million at June 30, 2009, the majority of which were for prime-rate based loans to be originated by
First Western, the government guaranteed portion of which is intended to be sold into the secondary
market. Our net working capital outlay would be approximately $4.0 million related to these loans.
Commitments have fixed expiration dates. Since some commitments expire without the proposed loan
closing, total committed amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. During
2009, we anticipate loan originations will range from $20 million to $30 million.
We may use funds to repurchase loans from the QSPEs which (1) become charged-off as defined
in the transaction documents either through delinquency or initiation of foreclosure or (2) reach
maturity. In addition, we may use funds to exercise clean-up calls and repay the outstanding
structured notes in related QSPEs or SPEs, including the 2002 Joint Venture which reached its
clean-up call option during January 2009. While there is no requirement to exercise the
clean-up call provision of the 2003 Joint Venture, if the structured notes are not repaid within
sixty days of the availability of the clean-up call, (1) the interest rate on these notes will
increase from LIBOR plus 1.25% to LIBOR plus 2.50% and (2) any excess cash generated will be used
to repay the structured notes instead of being distributed to us. We anticipate that the 2003
Joint Venture will attain its clean-up call option during the third quarter of 2009.
One of our SBICs has $2.0 million of redeemable preferred stock due in May 2010. We expect to
repay this redeemable preferred stock using the SBICs cash on hand.
Our Board of Trust Managers (the Board) authorized a share repurchase program for up to
$10.0 million for the purchase of outstanding common shares which expires September 26, 2010. The
common shares may be purchased from time to time in the open market or pursuant to negotiated
transactions using our Revolver. As of June 30, 2009, we had repurchased 249,979 shares under the
share repurchase program for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1,670,000, including
commissions. We are not currently purchasing shares under the plan.
We anticipate that we will pay dividends in excess of Modified Cash, using our Revolver, to
maintain our REIT status or as approved by our Board.
IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for a full description of recent
accounting pronouncements including the effect, if any, on our results of operations and financial
condition.
DIVIDENDS
Our shareholders are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the Board. In
determining dividend policy, the Board considers many factors including, but not limited to, actual
and anticipated Modified Cash, expectations for future earnings, REIT taxable income and
maintenance of REIT status, the economic environment, competition, our ability to obtain leverage
and our loan portfolio performance. In order to maintain REIT status, PMC Commercial is required
to pay out 90% of REIT taxable income. Consequently, the dividend rate on a quarterly basis will
not necessarily correlate directly to any single factor such as Modified Cash, REIT taxable income
or earnings expectations.
In order to meet our 2008 taxable income distribution requirements, we will make an election
under the Code to treat a portion of the distributions declared in 2009 as distributions of 2008s
REIT taxable income. These distributions are known as spillover dividends. The Board anticipates
utilizing the shortfall caused by spillover dividends to allow dividends declared in 2009 to exceed
our 2009 REIT taxable income.
35
REIT TAXABLE INCOME
REIT taxable income is a financial measure that is presented quarterly to assist investors in
analyzing our performance and is one of the factors utilized by our Board in determining the level
of dividends to be paid to our shareholders.
The following reconciles net income to REIT taxable income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,190 |
|
|
$ |
6,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,564 |
|
|
$ |
3,529 |
|
Book/tax difference on depreciation |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Book/tax difference on deferred gains from property
sales |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(762 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(424 |
) |
Book/tax difference on Retained Interests, net |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
Severance payments |
|
|
(1,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividend distribution from TRS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Book/tax difference on amortization and accretion |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
Asset valuation |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
Other book/tax differences, net |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
8,189 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
4,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: TRS income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT taxable income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,445 |
|
|
$ |
7,911 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
4,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared |
|
$ |
4,069 |
|
|
$ |
4,579 |
|
|
$ |
1,687 |
|
|
$ |
2,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
10,599 |
|
|
|
10,766 |
|
|
|
10,548 |
|
|
|
10,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a REIT, PMC Commercial generally will not be subject to corporate level Federal income tax
on net income that is currently distributed to shareholders provided the distribution exceeds 90%
of REIT taxable income. We may make an election under the Code to treat a portion of distributions
declared in the current year as distributions of the prior years taxable income. Upon election,
the Code provides that, in certain circumstances, a dividend declared subsequent to the close of an
entitys taxable year and prior to the extended due date of the entitys tax return may be
considered as having been made in the prior tax year in satisfaction of income distribution
requirements.
36
ITEM 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in various market metrics. We are
subject to market risk including liquidity risk, real estate risk and interest rate risk as
described below. Although management believes that the quantitative analysis on interest rate risk
below is indicative of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, it does not adjust for potential
changes in credit quality, size and composition of our balance sheet and other business
developments that could affect our financial position and net income. Accordingly, no assurances
can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the potential outcome simulated
by these estimates.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the potential that we would be unable to meet our obligations as they come
due because of an inability to liquidate assets or obtain funding. We are subject to changes in
the debt and collateralized mortgage markets. These markets are currently experiencing
disruptions, which could have an adverse impact on our earnings and financial condition.
Current conditions in the debt markets include lack of liquidity and large risk adjusted
premiums. These conditions have increased the cost and reduced the availability of financing
sources. The market for trading asset-backed securities is currently experiencing disruptions
resulting from reduced investor demand for these securities and increased investor yield
requirements. In light of current market conditions, we expect to finance our loan portfolio with
our current capital and Revolver. See Liquidity and Capital Resources Liquidity Summary for a
discussion of current availability under our Revolver.
Real Estate Risk
The value of our commercial mortgage loans and our ability to sell such loans, if necessary,
are impacted by market conditions that affect the properties that are collateral for our loans.
Property values and operating income from the properties may be affected adversely by a number of
factors, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
national, regional and local economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
significant rises in gasoline prices within a short period of time if there is a
concurrent decrease in business and leisure travel; |
|
|
|
|
local real estate conditions (including an oversupply of commercial real estate); |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters including hurricanes and earthquakes, acts of war and/or terrorism
and other events that may cause performance declines and/or losses to the owners and
operators of the real estate securing our loans; |
|
|
|
|
changes or continued weakness in limited service hospitality properties; |
|
|
|
|
construction quality, construction cost, age and design; |
|
|
|
|
demographic factors; |
|
|
|
|
increases in operating expenses (such as energy costs) for the owners of the
properties; and |
|
|
|
|
limitations in the availability and cost of leverage. |
In the event property operating income decreases, a borrower may have difficulty repaying our
loan, which could result in losses to us. In addition, decreases in property values reduce the
value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to borrowers to repay our loans, which
could also cause us to suffer losses.
37
The following analysis of our provision for loan losses quantifies the negative impact to our
net income from increased losses on our Retained Portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Ended |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
As reported (1) |
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
488 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
Annual loan losses increase by
50 basis points (2) |
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
Annual loan losses increase by
100 basis points (2) |
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes reductions of loan losses |
|
(2) |
|
Represents provision for loan losses based on increases in losses as a percentage of
our weighted average loans receivable for the periods indicated. |
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and
tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors.
Since our loans are predominantly variable-rate, based on LIBOR and the prime rate, our
operating results will depend in large part on LIBOR and the prime rate. One of the primary
determinates of our operating results is differences between the income from our loans and our
borrowing costs. As a result, most of our borrowings are based on LIBOR or the prime rate. The
objective of this strategy is to minimize the impact of interest rate changes on our net interest
income.
VALUATION OF LOANS
Our loans are recorded at cost and adjusted by net loan origination fees and discounts (which
are recognized as adjustments of yield over the life of the loan) and loan loss reserves. In order
to determine the estimated fair value of our loans, we use a present value technique for the
anticipated future cash flows using certain assumptions including a current market discount rate,
potential prepayment risks and loan losses. If we were required to sell our loans at a time we
would not otherwise do so, there can be no assurance that managements estimates of fair values
would be obtained and losses could be incurred.
At June 30, 2009, our loans are approximately 72% variable-rate at spreads over LIBOR or the
prime rate. Increases or decreases in interest rates will generally not have a material impact on
the fair value of our variable-rate loans. We had $133.5 million of variable-rate loans at June 30,
2009. The estimated fair value of our variable-rate loans (approximately $126.1 million at June
30, 2009) is dependent upon several factors including changes in interest rates and the market for
the type of loans we have originated.
We had $50.9 million and $39.3 million of fixed-rate loans at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively. The estimated fair value of these fixed-rate loans approximates their cost and
is dependent upon several factors including changes in interest rates and the market for the types
of loans that we have originated. Since changes in market interest rates do not affect the
interest rates on our fixed-rate loans, any changes in these rates do not have an immediate impact
on our interest income. Our interest rate risk on our fixed-rate loans is primarily related to
loan prepayments and maturities.
The average maturity of our loan portfolio is less than its average contractual terms because
of prepayments. The average life of mortgage loans tends to increase when the current mortgage
rates are substantially higher than rates on existing mortgage loans and, conversely, decrease when
the current mortgage rates are substantially lower than rates on existing mortgage loans (due to
refinancing of fixed-rate loans).
38
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had $133.5 million and $140.5 million of
variable-rate loans, respectively, and $50.9 million and $49.8 million of variable-rate debt,
respectively. On the differential between our variable-rate loans outstanding and our
variable-rate debt ($82.6 million and $90.7 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively) we have interest rate risk. To the extent variable rates decrease, our interest
income net of interest expense would decrease.
The sensitivity of our variable-rate loans and debt to changes in interest rates is regularly
monitored and analyzed by measuring the characteristics of our assets and liabilities. We assess
interest rate risk in terms of the potential effect on interest income net of interest expense in
an effort to ensure that we are insulated from any significant adverse effects from changes in
interest rates. As a result of our predominately variable-rate portfolio, our earnings are
susceptible to being reduced during periods of lower interest rates. Based on our analysis of the
sensitivity of interest income and interest expense at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, if the
consolidated balance sheet were to remain constant and no actions were taken to alter the existing
interest rate sensitivity, each hypothetical 100 basis point reduction in interest rates would
reduce net income by approximately $826,000 and $907,000, respectively, on an annual basis. Since
LIBOR has already been reduced to historically low levels, further significant negative impacts
from lower LIBOR interest rates is not anticipated. In addition, as a REIT, the use of hedging
interest rate risk is typically only provided on debt instruments due to potential negative REIT
compliance to the extent the hedging strategy was based on our investments. Benefits derived from
hedging strategies not based on debt instruments (i.e., investments) may be deemed bad income for
REIT qualification purposes. The use of a hedge strategy (on our debt instruments) would only be
beneficial to fix our cost of funds and hedge against rising interest rates.
DEBT
Our debt is comprised of SBA debentures, junior subordinated notes, the Revolver, structured
notes and redeemable preferred stock of subsidiary. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
approximately $15.4 million and $12.0 million, respectively, of our consolidated debt had fixed
rates of interest and was therefore not affected by changes in interest rates. Our variable-rate
debt is based on LIBOR or the prime rate and thus subject to adverse changes in market interest
rates. Assuming there were no increases or decreases in the balance outstanding under our
variable-rate debt at June 30, 2009, each hypothetical 100 basis points increase in interest rates
would increase interest expense and decrease net income by approximately $509,000.
Our fixed-rate debt at June 30, 2009 was comprised of SBA debentures, redeemable preferred
stock of subsidiary and structured notes. One SBA debenture ($4.0 million) currently has a
prepayment penalty of 1% of the principal balance.
The following tables present the principal amounts by year of expected maturity, weighted
average interest rates and fair values to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to
interest rate changes of our outstanding debt at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Month Periods Ending June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Fixed-rate debt (2) (3) |
|
$ |
2,695 |
|
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
$ |
812 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
$ |
9,181 |
|
|
$ |
15,375 |
|
|
$ |
15,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate debt (LIBOR
and prime based)
(4) |
|
|
23,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
50,870 |
|
|
|
42,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
26,495 |
|
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
$ |
812 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
$ |
36,251 |
|
|
$ |
66,245 |
|
|
$ |
57,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The estimated fair value is based on a present value calculation based on prices of the
same or similar instruments after considering risk, current interest rates and remaining
maturities. |
|
(2) |
|
The weighted average interest rate of our fixed-rate debt at June 30, 2009 was 6.3%. |
|
(3) |
|
Principal payments on the structured notes are dependent upon cash flows received from the
underlying loans. Our estimate of their repayment is based upon scheduled principal payments
on the underlying loans. Our estimate will differ from actual amounts to the extent we
experience prepayments and/or loan losses. |
|
(4) |
|
The weighted average interest rate of our variable-rate debt at June 30, 2009 was 3.6%. |
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Fixed-rate debt (2) |
|
$ |
1,956 |
|
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,168 |
|
|
$ |
12,044 |
|
|
$ |
12,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate debt (LIBOR
and prime rate based)
(3) |
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
49,770 |
|
|
|
40,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
24,656 |
|
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,238 |
|
|
$ |
61,814 |
|
|
$ |
52,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The estimated fair value is based on a present value calculation based on prices of the
same or similar instruments after considering risk, current interest rates and remaining
maturities. |
|
(2) |
|
The weighted average interest rate of our fixed-rate debt at December 31, 2008 was 6.3%. |
|
(3) |
|
The weighted average interest rate of our variable-rate debt at December 31, 2008 was 5.0%. |
RETAINED INTERESTS
Our Retained Interests are valued based on various factors including estimates of appropriate
discount rates. Changes in the discount rates used in determining the fair value of the Retained
Interests will impact their carrying value. Any appreciation of our Retained Interests is included
in the accompanying balance sheet in beneficiaries equity. Any depreciation of our Retained
Interests is either included in the accompanying statement of income as a permanent impairment or
on our balance sheet in beneficiaries equity as an unrealized loss. Assuming all other factors
(i.e., prepayments, losses, etc.) remained unchanged, if discount rates were 300 basis points and
500 basis points higher than rates estimated at June 30, 2009, the estimated fair value of our
Retained Interests at June 30, 2009 would have decreased by approximately $0.8 million and $1.2
million, respectively.
40
ITEM 4.
Controls and Procedures
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined under rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended) as of June 30, 2009. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
41
PART II
Other Information
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
In the normal course of business we are periodically party to certain legal actions and
proceedings involving matters that are generally incidental to our business (i.e., collection of
loans receivable). In managements opinion, the resolution of these legal actions and proceedings
will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
There have been no material changes to the factors disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
On September 26, 2008, our Board authorized a share repurchase program for up to $10.0 million
for the purchase of outstanding common shares, expiring September 26, 2010. The common shares may
be purchased from time to time in the open market or pursuant to negotiated transactions. We
purchased 57,008 common shares during the second quarter of 2009 in the open market as described
below.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
Maximum number (or |
|
|
|
Total number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
shares (or units) |
|
|
approximate dollar value) |
|
|
|
of shares (or |
|
|
price paid |
|
|
purchased as part of |
|
|
of shares (or units) that |
|
|
|
units) |
|
|
per share |
|
|
publicly announced |
|
|
may yet be purchased |
|
Period |
|
purchased |
|
|
(or unit) |
|
|
plans or programs |
|
|
under the plans or programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2009 |
|
|
37,381 |
|
|
$ |
6.58 |
|
|
|
230,352 |
|
|
$ |
8,470,895 |
|
May 2009 |
|
|
19,627 |
|
|
$ |
7.18 |
|
|
|
249,979 |
|
|
$ |
8,329,916 |
|
June 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,979 |
|
|
$ |
8,329,916 |
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
Defaults upon Senior Securities |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
At our Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on June 13, 2009 (the Annual Meeting), the
following individuals were elected to the Board with the following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Votes For |
|
|
Votes Withheld |
|
Nathan G. Cohen |
|
|
7,711,223 |
|
|
|
389,839 |
|
Martha R. Greenberg |
|
|
7,437,434 |
|
|
|
663,628 |
|
Barry A. Imber |
|
|
7,725,723 |
|
|
|
375,339 |
|
Irving Munn |
|
|
7,636,196 |
|
|
|
464,866 |
|
Lance B. Rosemore |
|
|
7,507,034 |
|
|
|
594,028 |
|
The proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent public
accountants was approved at the Annual Meeting. There were 7,550,217 votes for, 517,368 votes
against and 33,477 abstentions.
42
The shareholder proposal was not approved at the Annual Meeting. There were 928,285 votes
for, 3,407,579 votes against and 289,092 abstentions.
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
Other Information |
None.
A. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Declaration of Trust (incorporated by reference
to the exhibits to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-11
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 25,
1993, as amended (Registration No. 33-65910)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
(a) |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Declaration of Trust (incorporated by reference to
the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the SEC
on June 25, 1993, as amended (Registration No. 33-65910)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
(b) |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Declaration of Trust (incorporated by reference to
the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1993). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
(c) |
|
Amendment No. 3 to Declaration of Trust (incorporated by reference to
the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Bylaws (incorporated by reference to the
exhibits to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed
with the SEC on June 25, 1993, as amended (Registration No. 33-65910)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Bylaws (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on April 16, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Form of Executive Employment Contract
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Officer Certification Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Officer Certification Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
**32.1 |
|
|
Section 906 Officer Certification Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
**32.2 |
|
|
Section 906 Officer Certification Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Submitted herewith. |
43
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PMC Commercial Trust
|
|
Date: 8/07/09 |
/s/ Lance B. Rosemore
|
|
|
Lance B. Rosemore |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: 8/07/09 |
/s/ Barry N. Berlin
|
|
|
Barry N. Berlin |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
44
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Officer Certification Chief Executive Officer |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Officer Certification Chief Financial Officer |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 906 Officer Certification Chief Executive Officer |
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 906 Officer Certification Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Lance B. Rosemore, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PMC Commercial Trust; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: 08/07/09 |
/s/ Lance B. Rosemore
|
|
|
Lance B. Rosemore |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Barry N. Berlin, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PMC Commercial Trust; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: 08/07/09 |
/s/ Barry N. Berlin
|
|
|
Barry N. Berlin |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of PMC Commercial Trust (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Lance B. Rosemore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
/s/ Lance B. Rosemore
Lance B. Rosemore
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
August 7, 2009 |
|
|
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of PMC Commercial Trust (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Barry N. Berlin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
/s/ Barry N. Berlin
Barry N. Berlin
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
August 7, 2009 |
|
|
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.