Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One);
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 1-13610
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
TEXAS
|
|
75-6446078 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
of incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
17950 Preston Road, Suite 600, Dallas, TX 75252
|
|
(972) 349-3200 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Registrants telephone number) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
12b-2). YES o NO þ
As of April 30, 2009, the Registrant had outstanding 10,549,581 Common Shares of Beneficial
Interest, par value $.01 per share.
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
193,194 |
|
|
$ |
179,807 |
|
Retained interests in transferred assets |
|
|
24,742 |
|
|
|
33,248 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
10,244 |
|
|
|
10,606 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
233,558 |
|
|
$ |
227,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND BENEFICIARIES EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
$ |
27,070 |
|
|
$ |
27,070 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
22,700 |
|
Structured notes and debentures payable |
|
|
13,600 |
|
|
|
8,168 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock of subsidiary |
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
3,876 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
2,884 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
2,444 |
|
|
|
3,967 |
|
Borrower advances |
|
|
2,062 |
|
|
|
2,819 |
|
Deferred gains on property sales |
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
80,535 |
|
|
|
73,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficiaries equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares of beneficial interest; authorized 100,000,000
shares of $0.01 par value;
11,066,283 shares issued at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008,
10,586,962 and 10,694,788 shares outstanding at March 31,
2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
152,480 |
|
|
|
152,460 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of retained interests in transferred
assets |
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
Cumulative net income |
|
|
162,551 |
|
|
|
160,925 |
|
Cumulative dividends |
|
|
(159,211 |
) |
|
|
(156,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,638 |
|
|
|
157,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Treasury stock; at cost, 479,321 and 371,495 shares at March
31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
(4,515 |
) |
|
|
(3,825 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total parent company beneficiaries equity |
|
|
152,123 |
|
|
|
153,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests cumulative preferred stock of subsidiary |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total beneficiaries equity |
|
|
153,023 |
|
|
|
154,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and beneficiaries equity |
|
$ |
233,558 |
|
|
$ |
227,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
2,851 |
|
|
$ |
3,766 |
|
Income from retained interests in transferred assets |
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
Other income |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
3,991 |
|
|
|
6,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and related benefits |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
Interest |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
1,233 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
Provision for loan losses, net |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Permanent impairments on retained interests in transferred assets |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
2,377 |
|
|
|
3,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision and discontinued operations |
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sales of real estate |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,626 |
|
|
$ |
3,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
10,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
10,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,626 |
|
|
$ |
3,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation of retained interests
in transferred assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation arising during period |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
Net realized gains included in net income |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
1,713 |
|
|
$ |
3,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF BENEFICIARIES EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Transferred |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stock of |
|
|
Beneficiaries |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, January 1, 2008 |
|
|
10,765,033 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
152,331 |
|
|
$ |
1,945 |
|
|
$ |
151,119 |
|
|
$ |
(145,921 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,231 |
) |
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
157,254 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Dividends
($0.20 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,153 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, March 31, 2008 |
|
|
10,765,033 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
152,356 |
|
|
$ |
2,107 |
|
|
$ |
154,502 |
|
|
$ |
(148,074 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,231 |
) |
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
158,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Transferred |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stock of |
|
|
Beneficiaries |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, January 1, 2009 |
|
|
10,694,788 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
152,460 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
$ |
160,925 |
|
|
$ |
(156,829 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,825 |
) |
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
154,362 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Treasury shares, net |
|
|
(107,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(690 |
) |
Dividends ($0.225 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,382 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, March 31, 2009 |
|
|
10,586,962 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
152,480 |
|
|
$ |
707 |
|
|
$ |
162,551 |
|
|
$ |
(159,211 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,515 |
) |
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
153,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,626 |
|
|
$ |
3,383 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Permanent impairments on retained interests in transferred
assets |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
Gains on sales of real estate |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(338 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Provision for loan losses, net |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Premium income adjustment |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Amortization and accretion, net |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Capitalized loan origination costs |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Loans funded, held for sale |
|
|
(2,713 |
) |
|
|
(1,338 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of guaranteed loans |
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
Loan fees collected (remitted), net |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to/from affiliates, net |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Borrower advances |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(810 |
) |
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans funded |
|
|
(823 |
) |
|
|
(15,798 |
) |
Principal collected on loans |
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
|
9,684 |
|
Principal collected on retained interests in transferred assets |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
Principal collected on mortgage-backed security of affiliate |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Investment in retained interests in transferred assets |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in restricted investments, net |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(1,184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
(6,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares |
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility, net |
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Payment of principal on structured notes |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(3,905 |
) |
|
|
(3,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(1,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
(5,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
10,606 |
|
|
|
11,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
10,244 |
|
|
$ |
5,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying interim financial statements of PMC Commercial Trust (PMC Commercial or together
with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, we, us or our) have not been audited by independent
accountants. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
for complete financial statement presentation. In the opinion of management, the financial
statements reflect all adjustments necessary to present a fair statement of our financial position
at March 31, 2009 and results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. All material intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated. The results for the three months ended March 31, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of future financial results. Therefore, these financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Upon adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements (FAS 160), cumulative preferred stock of subsidiary was
reclassified from the mezzanine section of the balance sheet to beneficiaries equity and minority
interest as presented in the income statement was reclassified to interest expense. These
reclassifications had no effect on previously reported consolidated net income or cash flows, but
the adoption of FAS 160 and resulting prior period reclassification does increase our overall
consolidated beneficiaries equity.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (1) the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and (2) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Each of our qualified special purpose entities (QSPEs) contains a clean-up call provision which
gives PMC Commercial the option to repay the outstanding structured notes of the QSPE. PMC Joint
Venture, L.P. 2002 (the 2002 Joint Venture) reached this option during January 2009 becoming a
non-qualifying SPE; however, based on our current liquidity needs, the option was not exercised.
The subsidiary was determined to be a variable interest entity. Since we expect to absorb the
majority of the entitys future expected losses and receive the entitys expected residual returns,
PMC Commercial Trust is considered to be the primary beneficiary. As a result, effective in
January 2009, this subsidiary was consolidated in our financial statements. The operations of the
2002 Joint Venture were previously accounted for as retained interests in transferred assets. The
following table summarizes the assets and liabilities of the 2002 Joint Venture (which represents a
noncash transaction with the exception of the restricted investments):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Loans receivable |
|
$ |
12,570 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
1,410 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
14,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured notes payable |
|
$ |
5,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
5,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, during the second quarter of 2009, we anticipate that PMC Joint Venture, L.P. 2003
(the 2003 Joint Venture) will reach its clean-up call option becoming a non-qualifying SPE.
Based on our current liquidity needs, the option will not be exercised. Since we expect to absorb
the majority of the entitys future expected losses and receive the entitys
expected residual returns, PMC Commercial Trust would be considered the primary beneficiary. As a
result, this subsidiary would be consolidated in our second quarter 2009 financial statements.
7
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 2. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
During April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The FSP requires disclosures about fair
values of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies and is
effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted
for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB
28-1 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly was
issued in April 2009. FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in
accordance with FAS 157, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have
significantly decreased. This FSP also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that
indicate a transaction is not orderly. The FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009 and shall be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted
for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 to have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
FSP FAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination
That Arise from Contingencies was issued in April 2009. This FSP amends and clarifies FAS 141 to
address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and
accounting and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business
combination. FSP FAS 141(R)-1 is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of
FSP FAS 141(R)-1 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. This FSP provides additional guidance designed to create
greater clarity and consistency in accounting for and presenting impairment losses on securities
and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, applied
prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We do not
expect the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
Note 3. Loans Receivable, net:
Loans receivable, net, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial
mortgage loans (1) |
|
$ |
150,185 |
|
|
$ |
138,858 |
|
SBIC
commercial mortgage loans (2) |
|
|
27,054 |
|
|
|
27,311 |
|
SBA 7(a) Program loans |
|
|
12,465 |
|
|
|
11,444 |
|
SBA 7(a) Program loans held for sale |
|
|
4,368 |
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable |
|
|
194,072 |
|
|
|
180,605 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred commitment fees, net |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(318 |
) |
Loan loss reserves |
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
193,194 |
|
|
$ |
179,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $12,419 of loans held as collateral for the outstanding
structured notes of the 2002 Joint Venture. |
|
(2) |
|
Originated by our Small Business Investment Company (SBIC)
subsidiaries. |
8
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The activity in our loan loss reserves was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Principal balances written-off, net |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
616 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans are defined by generally accepted accounting principles as loans for which it is
probable that the lender will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original
contractual terms of the loan. Information on those loans considered to be impaired loans was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Impaired loans requiring reserves |
|
$ |
2,541 |
|
|
$ |
2,492 |
|
Impaired loans expected to be fully recoverable |
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
2,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
7,051 |
|
|
$ |
4,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Average impaired loans |
|
$ |
6,852 |
|
|
$ |
692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on impaired loans |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our recorded investment in non-accrual loans at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was
approximately $7.2 million and $5.1 million, respectively. We did not have any loans past due 90
days or more which were accruing interest at March 31, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
Note 4. Retained Interests:
We own subordinated financial interests in several non-consolidated QSPEs (i.e., retained
interests in transferred assets (Retained Interests)). The QSPEs are PMC Capital, L.P.
1998-1 (the 1998 Partnership), PMC Joint Venture, L.P. 2000 (the 2000 Joint Venture) and
the 2003 Joint Venture created in connection with structured loan sale transactions. In our
structured loan sale transactions, we contributed loans receivable to a QSPE in exchange for
cash and beneficial interests in that entity. The QSPE issued notes payable (the Structured
Notes) to unaffiliated parties (Structured Noteholders).
9
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Information pertaining to our structured loan sale transactions as of March 31, 2009 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
Joint |
|
|
Joint |
|
|
|
Partnership |
|
|
Venture |
|
|
Venture |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Principal outstanding on sold loans |
|
$ |
7,990 |
|
|
$ |
25,046 |
|
|
$ |
20,926 |
|
Structured Notes balance outstanding |
|
$ |
7,663 |
|
|
$ |
16,870 |
|
|
$ |
10,654 |
|
Cash in the collection account |
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
Cash in the reserve account |
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
1,675 |
|
|
$ |
2,207 |
|
Structured Notes outstanding for clean-up call (1) |
|
$ |
4,186 |
|
|
$ |
7,451 |
|
|
$ |
9,289 |
|
Weighted average interest rate of loans (2) |
|
|
P+1.55 |
% |
|
|
9.46 |
% |
|
|
L+4.02 |
% |
Interest rate on Structured Notes |
|
|
P-1.00 |
% |
|
|
7.28 |
% |
|
|
L+1.25 |
% |
Discount rate assumptions (3) |
|
6.0% to 15.4% |
|
9.1% to 15.4% |
|
6.0% to 15.6% |
Constant prepayment rate assumption (4) |
|
|
12.00 |
% |
|
|
12.00 |
% |
|
|
12.00 |
% |
Weighted average remaining life of Retained Interests (5) |
|
2.43 years |
|
1.71 years |
|
0.20 years |
Aggregate principal losses assumed (6) |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Aggregate principal losses to date (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Each of our securitization documents provides a clean-up call provision. A clean-up
call is an option to repurchase the remaining transferred assets when the amount of the
outstanding assets (or corresponding Structured Notes outstanding) falls to a level at which
the cost of servicing those assets becomes burdensome. |
|
(2) |
|
Variable interest rates are denoted by the spread over the prime rate (P) or the 90-day
LIBOR (L). |
|
(3) |
|
Discount rates utilized were (a) 6.0% to 9.1% for our required overcollateralization, (b)
10.1% to 10.3% for our reserve funds and (c) 15.4% to 15.6% for our interest-only strip
receivables. |
|
(4) |
|
The prepayment rate was based on the actual performance of the loan pools, adjusted for
anticipated principal prepayments considering similar loans. |
|
(5) |
|
The weighted average remaining life of Retained Interests was calculated by summing the
product of (a) the sum of the principal collections expected in each future period multiplied
by (b) the number of periods until collection, and then dividing that total by (c) the
remaining principal balance. |
|
(6) |
|
Represents aggregate estimated future losses as a percentage of the principal outstanding
based upon per annum losses ranging from 0.0% to 0.9%. |
|
(7) |
|
Represents aggregate principal losses to date as a percentage of the principal outstanding at
inception. |
First Western SBLC, Inc. (First Western) has Retained Interests related to the sale of loans
originated pursuant to the Small Business Administrations (SBA) 7(a) Program. We expect the SBA
guaranteed portions of First Westerns loans to be sold to either dealers in government guaranteed
loans or institutional investors (Secondary Market Loan Sales) as the loans are fully funded. On
Secondary Market Loan Sales, we may retain an excess spread between the interest rate paid to us
from our borrowers and the rate we pay to the purchaser of the guaranteed portion of the note and
servicing costs. At March 31, 2009, the aggregate principal balance of First Westerns serviced
loans on which we had an excess spread was approximately $26.5 million and the weighted average
excess spread was approximately 0.5%. In determining the fair value of our Retained Interests
related to Secondary Market Loan Sales, our assumptions at March 31, 2009 included a prepayment
speed of 15% per annum and a discount rate of 15.4%.
The components of our Retained Interests are the (1) required overcollateralization (the OC
piece), (2) reserve fund and the interest earned thereon and (3) interest-only strip receivable
(the IO Receivable).
10
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Our Retained Interests consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OC Piece |
|
|
Reserve Fund |
|
|
IO Receivable |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
First Western |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
293 |
|
1998 Partnership |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
2000 Joint Venture |
|
|
8,434 |
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
10,093 |
|
|
|
9,774 |
|
2003 Joint Venture |
|
|
10,378 |
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
12,680 |
|
|
|
12,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,243 |
|
|
$ |
4,445 |
|
|
$ |
1,054 |
|
|
$ |
24,742 |
|
|
$ |
24,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OC Piece |
|
|
Reserve Fund |
|
|
IO Receivable |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
First Western |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
1998 Partnership |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
1,514 |
|
2000 Joint Venture |
|
|
8,372 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
10,068 |
|
|
|
9,834 |
|
2002 Joint Venture |
|
|
7,223 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
8,756 |
|
|
|
8,671 |
|
2003 Joint Venture |
|
|
10,397 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
12,501 |
|
|
|
12,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,435 |
|
|
$ |
5,660 |
|
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
33,248 |
|
|
$ |
32,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between the estimated fair value and cost of our Retained Interests is reflected in
our consolidated balance sheets as unrealized appreciation of Retained Interests.
The following sensitivity analysis of our Retained Interests as of March 31, 2009 highlights the
volatility that results when losses and discount rates are different than our assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Asset |
|
Changed Assumption |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Change (1) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Losses increase by 50 basis points per annum (2) |
|
$ |
24,491 |
|
|
|
($251 |
) |
Losses increase by 100 basis points per annum (2) |
|
$ |
24,264 |
|
|
|
($478 |
) |
Discount rates increase by 300 basis points |
|
$ |
23,944 |
|
|
|
($798 |
) |
Discount rates increase by 500 basis points |
|
$ |
23,444 |
|
|
|
($1,298 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Any depreciation of our Retained Interests is either included in the accompanying statement
of income as a permanent impairment or on our balance sheet in beneficiaries equity as an
unrealized loss. |
|
(2) |
|
If we experience losses in excess of anticipated losses, the effect on our Retained Interests
would first be to reduce the value of the IO receivables. To the extent the IO receivables
could not fully absorb the losses, the effect would then be to reduce the value of our reserve
funds and then the value of our OC pieces. |
Due to the short-term weighted average remaining life of our Retained Interests and the diminishing
value of our interest-only strip receivables, there is no material asset change for increases in
prepayment rates.
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. Values based on changes in
these assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated since the relationship of the change in an
assumption to the change in fair value is not linear. The effect of a variation in a particular
assumption on the fair value of our Retained Interests is calculated without changing
any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor are not isolated from changes in another
which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
11
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Our consolidated financial statements do not include the assets, liabilities, partners capital,
revenues or expenses of the QSPEs. As a result, at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 our
consolidated balance sheets do not include $60.1 million and $77.6 million of assets, respectively,
and $35.3 million and $44.0 million of liabilities, respectively, related to our structured loan
sale transactions recorded by the QSPEs. At March 31, 2009, the partners capital of the QSPEs was
approximately $24.8 million and the estimated fair value of the associated Retained Interests was
approximately $24.4 million.
The annualized yield on our Retained Interests, which is comprised of the income earned less
permanent impairments, was 10.6% and 11.4% during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Note 5. Debt:
Information on our consolidated debt was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon Rate at |
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Face |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Range of |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured notes and
debentures
payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures |
|
$ |
8,190 |
|
|
$ |
8,169 |
|
|
$ |
8,190 |
|
|
$ |
8,168 |
|
|
|
2013 to 2015 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
Structured notes (1) |
|
|
5,431 |
|
|
|
5,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
6.67 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,621 |
|
|
|
13,600 |
|
|
|
8,190 |
|
|
|
8,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated
notes |
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
2035 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
% |
|
|
7.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit
facility |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable
preferred stock of
subsidiary |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
|
2009 to 2010 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
$ |
71,691 |
|
|
$ |
71,574 |
|
|
$ |
61,960 |
|
|
$ |
61,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents structured notes relating to the 2002 Joint Venture, consolidated beginning in
January 2009. Principal payments of these structured notes are dependent upon cash flows
received from the underlying loans. Our estimate of their repayment is based on scheduled
principal payments on the underlying loans. Our estimate will differ from actual amounts to
the extent we experience prepayments and/or loan losses. |
Note 6. Earnings Per Share:
The computations of basic earnings per common share are based on our weighted average shares
outstanding. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding was 10,650,000 and
10,765,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, no shares were added to the weighted average shares
outstanding for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share as options were anti-dilutive.
Not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share were outstanding options to purchase
approximately 59,000 and 99,000 common shares during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively, because the options exercise prices were greater than the average market price
of the shares.
12
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 7. Dividends Declared:
The Board of Trust Managers declared a $0.225 per common share quarterly dividend to common
shareholders of record on March 31, 2009, which was paid on April 13, 2009.
We have certain covenants within our revolving credit facility which limit our ability to pay out
returns of capital as part of our dividends. These restrictions have not historically limited the
amount of dividends we have paid and management does not believe that they will restrict future
dividend payments.
Note 8. Share Repurchase Program:
Our Board of Trust Managers authorized a share repurchase program for up to $10.0 million for the
purchase of outstanding common shares which expires September 26, 2010. The common shares may be
purchased from time to time in the open market or pursuant to negotiated transactions. As of
April 30, 2009, we had repurchased 230,352 shares under the share repurchase program for an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $1,529,000, including commissions.
Note 9. Income Taxes:
PMC Commercial has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). To qualify as a REIT, PMC Commercial must
meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we
distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our shareholders. As a REIT, PMC Commercial
generally will not be subject to corporate level Federal income tax on net income that is currently
distributed to shareholders. In order to meet our 2008 taxable income distribution requirements,
we will make an election under the Code to treat a portion of the
distributions declared in 2009 as
distributions of 2008s REIT taxable income.
PMC Commercial has wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRSs) which are subject to Federal
income taxes. The income generated from the TRSs is taxed at normal corporate rates.
Note 10. Restructuring Costs:
In October 2008, due to economic and market conditions, we announced a number of cost reduction
initiatives. These initiatives included streamlining our sales, credit and servicing, as well as
outsourcing some functions. These changes resulted in one-time severance related charges of
approximately $1.8 million during 2008. We paid approximately $1.4 million of this severance
during April 2009.
The table below summarizes the balance of accrued severance and related benefits, which is included
in the balance of accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets, and the
changes in the accrued amounts as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,596 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accrued balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11. Fair Value Measurements:
At March 31, 2009, Retained Interests was our only asset that is required to be measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is
based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In
general, quoted market prices from active markets for the identical asset (Level 1 inputs),
if
available, should be used to value an asset. If quoted prices are not available for the identical
asset, then a determination should be made if Level 2 inputs are available. Level 2 inputs
include quoted prices for similar assets in active markets or for identical or similar assets in
markets that are not active (i.e., markets in which there are few transactions for the asset, the
prices are not current, price quotations vary substantially, or in which little information is
released publicly). There is little or no market information for our Retained Interests, thus
there are no Level 1 or Level 2 determinations available. Level 3 inputs are unobservable
inputs for the asset. Unobservable inputs are used to measure fair value when observable inputs
are not available. These inputs include our expectations about the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset in a current transaction.
13
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
We use Level 3 inputs to determine the estimated fair value of our Retained Interests. The
following is activity for our Retained Interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
33,248 |
|
|
$ |
48,616 |
|
Principal collections |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(660 |
) |
Realized gains included in net income (1) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
Investments |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Permanent impairments |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(281 |
) |
Consolidation (2) |
|
|
(8,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value, end of period |
|
$ |
24,742 |
|
|
$ |
47,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost, end of period |
|
$ |
24,035 |
|
|
$ |
45,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included within income from Retained Interests. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the 2002 Joint Venture. |
We may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These adjustments
to fair value usually result from loan loss reserves on individual loans. For financial and
nonfinancial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, the following table provides the carrying value of the related individual
assets at quarter end. We use Level 3 inputs to determine the estimated fair value of our
impaired loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
|
Carrying value at |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Impaired loans (1) |
|
$ |
6,868 |
|
|
$ |
2,051 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents carrying value and related provision for loan losses on loans for which
adjustments are based on the appraised value of the collateral, tax assessed value of the
collateral, and/or operating statistics. |
Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies:
Loan Commitments
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer provided the terms established in
the contract are met. Our outstanding loan commitments and approvals to fund loans were
approximately $6.7 million at March 31, 2009, all of which were for prime-based loans to be
originated by First Western, the government guaranteed portion of which may be sold pursuant to
Secondary Market Loan Sales. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates. Since some
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements.
14
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Operating Lease
We lease office space in Dallas, Texas under a lease which expires in October 2011. Future minimum
lease payments under this lease are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ending |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
206 |
|
2011 |
|
|
217 |
|
2012 |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreements
We have employment agreements with our executive officers for three-year terms expiring June 30,
2011. In the event of a change in responsibilities, as defined, during the employment period, the
agreements provide for severance compensation to the executive officer in a lump sum payment in an
amount equal to 2.99 times the average of the last three years annual compensation paid to the
executive officer.
Structured Loan Sale Transactions
The documents of the structured loan sale transactions contain provisions (the Credit Enhancement
Provisions) that govern the assets and the inflow and outflow of funds of the entities originally
formed as part of the structured loan sale transactions. The Credit Enhancement Provisions include
specified limits on the delinquency rates on the loans included in each structured loan sale
transaction. If, at any measurement date, the delinquency rate with respect to any structured loan
sale transaction were to exceed the specified limits, the Credit Enhancement Provisions would
automatically increase the level of credit enhancement requirements for that structured loan sale
transaction. During the period in which the specified delinquency rate was exceeded, excess cash
flow from the entity, if any, which would otherwise be distributable to us, would be used to fund
the increased credit enhancement levels up to the principal amount of such loans and would delay or
reduce our distribution. In general, there can be no assurance that amounts deferred under Credit
Enhancement Provisions would be received in future periods or that future deferrals or losses will
not occur. As a result of delinquent and impaired loans in the 2002 Joint Venture and the 2003
Joint Venture, Credit Enhancement Provisions were triggered during the first quarter of 2009. As a
consequence, cash flows related to these transactions were deferred and utilized to fund the
increased reserve requirements. Based on current cash flow assumptions, management anticipates
that the funds from the 2002 Joint Venture will be received in future periods. For the 2003 Joint
Venture, management anticipates that the funds will be received in future periods or used to repay
the structured notes based on timing of attainment of the clean-up call option.
Litigation
We had significant outstanding claims against Arlington Hospitality, Inc.s and its subsidiary,
Arlington Inns, Inc.s (together Arlington) bankruptcy estates. Arlington objected to our claims
and initiated a complaint in the bankruptcy seeking, among other things, the return of payments
Arlington made pursuant to the property leases and the master lease agreement.
15
PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
While confident that a substantial portion of our claims would have been allowed and the claims
against us would have been disallowed, due to the exorbitant cost of defense coupled with the
likelihood of reduced available assets in the debtors estates to pay claims, we executed an
agreement with Arlington to settle our claims against Arlington and Arlingtons claims against us.
The settlement provides that Arlington will dismiss its claims seeking the return of certain
payments made pursuant to the property leases and master lease agreement and substantially reduces
our claims against the Arlington estates. The settlement further provides for mutual releases
among the parties. The Bankruptcy Court approved the settlement. Accordingly, there are no
remaining assets or liabilities recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements
related to this matter. However, the settlement will only become final upon the Bankruptcy Courts
approval of Arlingtons liquidation plan which was filed during the third quarter of 2007. Due to
the complexity of the bankruptcy, we cannot estimate when, or if, the liquidation plan will be
approved.
In the normal course of business we are periodically party to certain legal actions and proceedings
involving matters that are generally incidental to our business (i.e., collection of loans
receivable). In managements opinion, the resolution of these legal actions and proceedings will
not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Other
If the SBA establishes that a loss on an SBA guaranteed loan is attributable to significant
technical deficiencies in the manner in which the loan was originated, funded or serviced by First
Western, the SBA may seek recovery of funds from us. With respect to the guaranteed portion of SBA
loans that have been sold, the SBA will first honor its guarantee and then seek compensation from
us in the event that a loss is deemed to be attributable to technical deficiencies.
16
ITEM 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are
intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. Such forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect, intend,
believe, anticipate, estimate, or continue, or the negative thereof or other variations or
similar words or phrases. These statements include the plans and objectives of management for
future operations, including, but not limited to, plans and objectives relating to future growth of
the loan portfolio and availability of funds. The forward-looking statements included herein are
based on current expectations and there can be no assurance that these expectations will be
attained. For a description of certain factors that could cause our future results to differ
materially from those expressed in any such forward-looking statement, see Recent Developments and
Trends That May Affect our Business. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with
respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future
business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of
which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and,
therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q
will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the
forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be
regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be
achieved. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. We do not undertake to update
them to reflect changes that occur after the date they are made.
The following discussion of our financial condition at March 31, 2009 and results of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 should be read in conjunction with
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. For a more detailed
description of the risks affecting our financial condition and results of operations, see Risk
Factors in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND TRENDS THAT MAY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS
The following provides an update of our recent developments and trends that may affect our
business included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 that may
have an impact on our financial condition and results of operations. The factors described below
could impact the volume of loan originations, the income we earn on our assets, our liquidity and
growth potential, the performance of our loans and/or the performance of the QSPEs.
Economic Environment
In response to market disruptions, legislators and financial regulators implemented a number
of mechanisms designed to add stability and/or liquidity to the financial markets. The overall
effects of these and other legislative and regulatory efforts on the financial markets is
uncertain. Should these initiatives fail, our business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects could be materially adversely affected.
Impact on us
In the short-term, we believe the current economic environment will provide increasing
challenges to our industry, us and the general economy. We continue to believe our commercial
lending business has strong long-term fundamentals. However, due to the economic uncertainties, we
continue to experience the following:
|
|
|
Loan origination limitations; |
|
|
|
|
Reduced operating margins due to lack of economies of scale; |
|
|
|
|
Limited access to capital, and if such capital is available, at increased costs that
may be significant; |
|
|
|
|
An increase in non-performing loans and watch list assets; |
|
|
|
|
An increase in loan loss reserves; |
|
|
|
|
An inability to engage in structured loan transactions; and |
|
|
|
|
Reduced cash available for distribution to shareholders, particularly as our portfolio
yield is reduced by lower
variable interest rates, scheduled maturities, prepayments and non-performing loans. |
17
Liquidity Overview
Our revolving credit facility matures December 31, 2009. We are currently negotiating to
extend the maturity date of our revolving credit facility; however, the credit markets remain
extremely illiquid which may make it difficult and possibly cost prohibitive to extend our
revolving credit facility. We believe that our revolving credit facility will be extended until at
least December 31, 2010. However, the aggregate amount available under our revolving credit
facility may decrease and/or the cost of the revolving credit facility, including any up-front
costs and ongoing interest expense and/or unused fees, could increase. We believe our current
capital needs can be met by our $45 million revolving credit facility. To the extent we need
additional capital, there can be no assurance that we would be able to increase the amount
available under our revolving credit facility or identify other sources of funds with acceptable
terms. We have availability under our revolving credit facility; however, the limited amount of
capital available to originate new loans has caused us to significantly restrict non-SBA 7(a)
Program loan origination activity. As a result, all of our outstanding loan commitments are for
SBA 7(a) Program loans.
Strategic Alternatives
The credit and capital market environment remains unstable so we continue to review and
analyze potential strategic and liquidity alternatives. While we continue to explore and evaluate
future opportunities as they present themselves, our primary focus is presently on maximizing the
value of our current investment portfolio and business strategy. Alternatives that we continue to
evaluate include the potential benefits that we could achieve through investment in, acquisition
of, or conversion to, a bank. There are significant obstacles in becoming a bank including legal,
regulatory and shareholder approvals. However, given current market conditions and valuations for
commercial mortgage REITs, we will continue to evaluate whether the benefits outweigh the risks.
Current Reliance on the SBA 7(a) Program
We are focusing on origination of SBA 7(a) Program loans which require less capital due to the
ability to sell the government guaranteed portion of such loans. We utilize the SBA 7(a) Program
to originate small business loans and then sell the government guaranteed portion to investors who
then bundle and sell those loans using the asset-backed securities market. During April 2009, we
sold approximately $4.5 million (guaranteed portion) of SBA 7(a) Program loans.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the Stimulus Bill) was passed in February 2009.
The Stimulus Bill contains provisions that benefit the SBA which may have a positive impact on our
lending operations. The Stimulus Bill provided the SBA with funding to eliminate fees on SBA 7(a)
Program loans and provided increased SBA guarantee percentages on SBA 7(a) Program loans of up to
90% for certain loans. These program changes are expected to be in effect for the remainder of
2009. In addition, the Stimulus Bill established a Secondary Market Lending Authority which may
make direct loans to broker-dealers that participate in the secondary market for SBA 7(a) Program
loans and provides for the ability to establish a secondary market for pools of first lien loans
under the 504 program. The Stimulus Bill authorized the SBA to deploy federal guarantees for pools
of these first lien loans so that they could be sold to investors in a secondary market.
We believe these initiatives will increase the volume and profitability of our SBA 7(a)
Program in the short-term. In addition, we believe our liquidity has been, and will continue to
be, benefitted through a more active secondary market.
18
Cost Reduction Initiatives
In October 2008, due to economic and market conditions, we announced cost reduction
initiatives. These initiatives included streamlining our sales, credit and servicing, as well as
outsourcing some functions. Management estimates annual savings for these initiatives to be
approximately $1.0 million to $1.2 million which will primarily be a reduction of salaries and
related benefits on our consolidated income statement.
Loan Portfolio Performance
Our aggregate portfolio continues to have minimal loan losses; however, we believe that
worsening economic conditions have subjected our borrowers to financial stress. We have seen an
increase in payment delinquencies, slow pays, insufficient funds payments, late fees, non-payment
of real estate taxes and borrower requests for deferments of payment of principal and interest. Our
recorded investment in non-accrual loans increased from $5,062,000 (2.8% of our retained loans) at
December 31, 2008 to $7,229,000 (3.7% of our retained loans) at March 31, 2009. Additional changes
to the facts and circumstances of the individual borrowers, the limited service hospitality
industry and the economy may require the establishment of significant additional loan loss reserves
and the effect on our results of operations and financial condition may be material.
We are currently in the process of foreclosure proceedings on several properties, primarily
limited service hospitality properties, collateralizing our serviced loans. Historically, many
borrowers have brought their loans current; thus, we stopped the foreclosure process. It is
difficult to determine what impact the current market disruptions will have on our borrowers whose
collateral is in the process of foreclosure and the borrowers ability to become current on their
loans. We estimate that the foreclosure processes will be completed within six to eighteen months;
however, foreclosure is a complex and generally time consuming process that is subject to state
laws and regulations.
Loan Activity
During the first three months of 2009 we funded approximately $3.5 million of loans. We
anticipate that our fundings during 2009 will be between $20 million and $30 million. We have been
concentrating on longer-term loan originations with real estate for collateral and are now
targeting loans between $500,000 and $2,000,000. However, there remains significant competition
for SBA 7(a) Program loans from banks that are willing and able to provide lower interest rate
terms than us primarily due to fees generated from other bank products.
We had a significant amount of prepayments of our serviced loans during the past three years.
The result has been a reduction in our total serviced portfolio outstanding from its peak of
approximately $498 million during 2004 to approximately $275 million at March 31, 2009. Our
prepayment activity slowed during the last half of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 and we expect
that the amount of prepayments will continue at this level during 2009 or be further reduced.
There were no prepayments of our retained loans during the first quarter of 2009.
In addition to our retained portfolio of $194 million, at March 31, 2009, we service
approximately $81 million of aggregate principal balance remaining on loans that were sold in
structured loan sale transactions and Secondary Market Loan Sales. Since we retain a residual
interest in the cash flows from these sold loans, the performance of these loans impacts our
profitability and our cash available for dividend distributions. Therefore, we provide information
on both our loans retained (the Retained Portfolio) and combined with sold loans that we service
(the Serviced Portfolio).
Information on our Serviced Portfolio, including prepayment trends, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Serviced Portfolio (1) |
|
$ |
275,014 |
|
|
$ |
275,530 |
|
|
$ |
326,368 |
|
|
$ |
397,567 |
|
|
$ |
447,220 |
|
|
$ |
468,158 |
|
|
Loans funded |
|
$ |
3,536 |
|
|
$ |
34,587 |
|
|
$ |
33,756 |
|
|
$ |
51,686 |
|
|
$ |
49,942 |
|
|
$ |
49,733 |
|
|
Prepayments (2) |
|
$ |
787 |
|
|
$ |
68,556 |
|
|
$ |
84,137 |
|
|
$ |
91,710 |
|
|
$ |
41,049 |
|
|
$ |
15,931 |
|
|
% Prepayments (3) (4) |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Serviced Portfolio outstanding before loan loss reserves and deferred commitment
fees. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include balloon maturities of SBA 504 program loans. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents prepayments as a percentage of the Serviced Portfolio outstanding as of
the beginning of the applicable year.
|
|
(4) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, annualized prepayments as a percentage
of our Serviced Portfolio outstanding as of the beginning of the applicable year were
1.1%. |
19
LOAN PORTFOLIO INFORMATION AND STATISTICS
General
Loans funded during the first three months of 2009 were approximately $3.5 million, which is
significantly less than the $17.1 million of loans we funded during the comparable period of 2008.
We currently anticipate loan fundings to be between $20 million and $30 million during 2009. At
March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008, our outstanding commitments to fund loans
were approximately $6.7 million, $10.0 million and $23.1 million, respectively. All of our current
commitments are for variable-rate SBA 7(a) Program loans based on the prime rate which provide an
interest rate match with our present sources of funds and these loans also provide an SBA guarantee
for a portion of the loan amount. Due to our enhanced marketing efforts and the Stimulus Bill
which eliminated fees on SBA 7(a) Program loans, we have seen an increase in our outstanding
commitments to funds loans. As of April 30, 2009, our outstanding commitments to funds loans were
approximately $12.0 million.
Loan Portfolio Rollforward
Loans originated and principal repayments on our Retained Portfolio were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Loans Originated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Funded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA 7(a) Program loans |
|
$ |
3,536 |
|
|
$ |
1,751 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,440 |
|
SBA 504 program loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans funded |
|
|
3,536 |
|
|
|
17,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Loan Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Joint Venture (1) |
|
|
12,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans originated |
|
$ |
16,106 |
|
|
$ |
17,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Repayments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled principal payments |
|
$ |
1,829 |
|
|
$ |
728 |
|
Proceeds from the sale of SBA 7(a) guaranteed loans |
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
Prepayments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal repayments |
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
|
$ |
10,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We reached our clean-up call provision resulting in loans which were previously
off-balance sheet now being included in our Retained Portfolio. |
20
Interest Rate and Yield Information
Interest rate and yield information on our Retained Portfolio was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average contractual interest rate |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized average yield (1) (2) |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In addition to interest income, the annualized average yield includes all fees
earned and is adjusted by the provision for loan losses, net. |
|
(2) |
|
For the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the year ended
December 31, 2008. |
The LIBOR and the prime rate used in determining interest rates to be charged to our borrowers
during the second quarter of 2009 (set on April 1, 2009) is 1.21% and 3.25%, respectively, while
the LIBOR and prime rate charged during the first quarter of 2009 (set on January 1, 2009) was
1.44% and 3.25%, respectively. To the extent LIBOR or the prime rate changes, we will have changes
in interest income from our variable-rate loans.
The weighted average contractual interest rate on our Serviced Portfolio was 6.3%, 7.9% and
8.7% at March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively.
Retained Portfolio Breakdown
Our Retained Portfolio was comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Retained Portfolio |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Retained Portfolio |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Variable-rate LIBOR |
|
$ |
121,839 |
|
|
|
63.1 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
$ |
123,081 |
|
|
|
68.4 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
Fixed-rate (1) |
|
|
50,885 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
39,297 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
Variable-rate prime |
|
|
20,470 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
17,429 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
193,194 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
$ |
179,807 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At March 31, 2009, includes approximately $12.4 million of loans from the 2002
Joint Venture. |
Impaired Loan Data
Senior management closely monitors our impaired loans which are classified into two
categories: Problem Loans and Special Mention Loans (together, Impaired Loans). Our Problem
Loans are loans which are not complying with their contractual terms, the collection of the balance
of the principal is considered unlikely and on which the fair value of the collateral is less than
the remaining unamortized principal balance. Our Special Mention Loans are those loans that are
either
not complying or had previously not complied with their contractual terms but, in general, we
expect a full recovery of the principal balance through either collection efforts or liquidation of
collateral.
21
Our Impaired Loans were as follows (balances represent our investment in the loans prior to
loan loss reserves and deferred commitment fees):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Problem Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
$ |
2,553 |
|
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
Sold loans of QSPEs (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,553 |
|
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
$ |
9,073 |
|
|
$ |
9,294 |
|
Sold loans of QSPEs (1) |
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,624 |
|
|
$ |
10,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Problem Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Sold loans of QSPEs (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Special Mention Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Sold loans of QSPEs (1) |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We do not include the remaining outstanding principal of serviced loans pertaining
to the government guaranteed portion of SBA 7(a) Program loans sold into the secondary
market since the SBA has guaranteed payment of principal on these loans. |
At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had reserves of $616,000 and $480,000,
respectively. Our provision for loan losses (excluding reductions of loan losses) as a percentage
of our weighted average outstanding loans receivable was 0.08% and 0.04% during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. To the extent one or several of our loans experience
significant operating difficulties and we are forced to liquidate the loans, future losses may be
substantial.
We may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These adjustments
to fair value usually result from loan loss reserves on individual loans. We use Level 3 inputs
to determine the estimated fair value of our Impaired Loans. Adjustments to the carrying value of
Impaired Loans are generally based on the appraised value of the collateral, tax assessed value of
the collateral and/or operating statistics.
RETAINED INTERESTS
At March 31, 2009, Retained Interests was our only asset that is required to be measured at
fair value on a recurring basis. There is little or no market information for our Retained
Interests, thus there are no Level 1 or Level 2
determinations available. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset.
Unobservable inputs are used to measure fair value when observable inputs are not available.
These inputs include our expectations about the assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing the asset in a current transaction. Due to the limited number of entities that conduct
structured loan sale transactions with similar assets, the relatively small size of our Retained
Interests and the limited number of buyers for such assets, no readily ascertainable market exists
for our Retained Interests. Therefore, we utilize our own data and assumptions to determine the
value of our Retained Interests, in conjunction with our knowledge of similar markets for our type
of Retained Interests. Based on these factors, our estimate of fair value may vary significantly
from what a willing buyer would pay for these assets.
22
The estimated fair value of our Retained Interests is determined based on the present value of
estimated future cash flows from the QSPEs. This valuation is dependent upon estimates of future
cash flows that are based on the performance of the underlying loans and estimates of discount
rates. Prepayments or losses in excess of estimates may cause unrealized depreciation and
potentially impairments. The estimated future cash flows are calculated based on assumptions
including, among other things, prepayment speeds and loan losses. We regularly measure loan loss
and prepayment assumptions against the actual performance of the loans sold and to the extent
adjustments to our assumptions are deemed necessary, they are made on a quarterly basis.
As a result of the lack of available market inputs, at the time our securitization
transactions were completed and for each quarterly valuation update, we utilized a cash flow model
to determine the estimated fair value of our Retained Interests. The turmoil in the credit markets
has spotlighted the use of cash flow models and management has evaluated the complexities and range
of judgments inherent in using cash flow models. As such, we have reevaluated our discount rates,
future prepayments and loan losses on the underlying securitized loans in light of the current
illiquid markets.
The discount rates utilized in computing the net present value of future cash flows are based
on an estimate of the inherent risk associated with each cash flow stream (i.e., interest-only
strip receivable, reserve funds and overcollateralized piece). Although we believe these estimates
of discount rates are reasonable estimates of the market rate, purchasers of these types of
investments may utilize different discount rates in determining their value of the estimated future
cash flows considering the current market illiquidity.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
3,991 |
|
|
$ |
6,422 |
|
|
$ |
(2,431 |
) |
|
|
(37.9 |
%) |
Total expenses |
|
$ |
2,377 |
|
|
$ |
3,295 |
|
|
$ |
(918 |
) |
|
|
(27.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1,596 |
|
|
$ |
3,045 |
|
|
$ |
(1,449 |
) |
|
|
(47.6 |
%) |
Net income |
|
$ |
1,626 |
|
|
$ |
3,383 |
|
|
$ |
(1,757 |
) |
|
|
(51.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
(46.4 |
%) |
Net income |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
(51.6 |
%) |
Net income decreased from the first quarter of 2008 compared to the first quarter of 2009
primarily due to:
|
|
|
A decrease in income from Retained Interests of $1,003,000 due primarily to a
reduction in our weighted average Retained Interests of 49% and a decrease in
unanticipated prepayment fees of $413,000. The 1999 Partnership, 2001 Joint Venture
and 2002 Joint Venture, which were previously included in Retained Interests
(off-balance sheet entities) are now consolidated; |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in interest income of $915,000 due primarily to declining variable
interest rates; and |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in other income of $513,000 due primarily to a reduction in prepayment
fees. We did not have any prepayments on our Retained Portfolio during the three
months ended March 31, 2009. |
23
The above reductions in net income were partially offset by:
|
|
|
A decrease in interest expense of $427,000 due primarily to declining variable
interest rates; and |
|
|
|
|
A reduction in overhead (salaries and related benefits and general and
administrative expenses) of $344,000 due primarily to our cost reduction initiatives. |
We anticipate that the 2003 Joint Venture will reach its clean-up call option during the
second quarter of 2009 and be consolidated in our financial statements. At March 31, 2009, the
2003 Joint Venture had loans of $20.9 million, structured notes of $10.7 million and restricted
cash of $2.4 million.
More detailed comparative information on the composition of and changes in our revenues and
expenses is provided below.
Revenues
Interest income consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest income loans |
|
$ |
2,816 |
|
|
$ |
3,601 |
|
Accretion of loan fees and discounts |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Interest income idle funds |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,851 |
|
|
$ |
3,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in interest income loans was primarily attributable to decreases in interest
rates partially offset by an increase in our weighted average loans receivable outstanding. Our
weighted average loans receivable outstanding increased to approximately $189.9 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2009 from $169.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008
primarily due to the consolidation of loans previously included in an off-balance sheet entity
(approximately $12.6 million) during January 2009. At March 31, 2009, approximately 74% of our
loans had variable interest rates. The base LIBOR rate charged to our borrowers decreased from
4.73% during the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 1.44% during the three months ended March 31,
2009. To the extent these rates decline, they will have a negative impact on our earnings. In
addition, primarily due to the weakened economy and recession, our non-accrual loans have
increased. Non-accrual loans increased to $7.2 million at March 31, 2009 from $4.6 million at
March 31, 2008. The decrease in our idle funds interest income is primarily due to a decrease in
money market rates earned on cash and cash equivalents of our SBICs. These funds can only be used
for commitments of the SBICs.
Income from Retained Interests decreased $1,003,000 primarily due to a decrease in the
weighted average balance of our Retained Interests outstanding of $23.4 million to $24.8 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $48.2 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2008 due primarily to the repayment of the 1999 Partnership and 2001 Joint Venture
structured notes and exercise of their related clean-up call provisions and the attainment of the
clean-up call provision on the 2002 Joint Venture. In addition, there was a decrease in
unanticipated prepayment fees of $413,000. The yield on our Retained Interests, which is comprised
of the income earned less permanent impairments, decreased to 10.6% during the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to 11.4% during the three months ended March 31, 2008. Our income from
Retained Interests will continue to decline (1) as scheduled principal payments and prepayments
of the sold loans of our QSPEs occur and/or (2) additional clean-up call options are
attained. We anticipate that the 2003 Joint Venture will attain its clean-up call option during
the second quarter of 2009.
24
Other income consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Servicing income |
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
Loan related income other |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Premium income |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Equity in earnings |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Prepayment fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
Other |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We earn fees for servicing all loans held by the QSPEs and loans sold into the secondary
market. As these fees are based on the principal balance of sold loans outstanding, they will
continue to decrease over time as scheduled principal payments and prepayments occur and/or
clean-up calls are attained, unless there is an increase in loans sold into the secondary market.
During April 2009, we sold approximately $4.5 million (guaranteed portion) of SBA 7(a) Program
loans into the secondary market.
We saw high levels of prepayment activity during the first half of 2008; however, our
prepayment activity slowed during the last half of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. We
anticipate that the amount of prepayments will continue at low levels during the remainder of 2009.
We had no prepayments of retained loans during the first quarter of 2009. Prepayment fee income
is dependent upon a number of factors and is not generally predictable as the mix and amount of
loans prepaying is not known.
Premium income or loss results from the sale of the government guaranteed portion of SBA 7(a)
Program loans into the secondary market. During April 2009, we sold approximately $4.5 million
(guaranteed portion) of SBA 7(a) Program loans into the secondary market and collected cash
premiums of approximately $158,000. Premium income will not equal collected cash premiums because
(1) premium income represents the difference between the relative fair value attributable to the
sale of the guaranteed portion of the loan and the principal balance (cost) of the loan adjusted by
costs of origination and (2) the guaranteed portions of some loans were sold for future servicing
instead of up-front cash premiums. Due to the cash premiums being lower than historical levels,
the profitability of loan sales is significantly reduced and may be a loss.
Interest Expense
Interest expense consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
$ |
560 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Debentures payable |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Structured notes |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conduit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
Other |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
806 |
|
|
$ |
1,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
The weighted average cost of our funds for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was 4.6% compared
to 6.1% during the quarter ended March 31, 2008. Interest expense on the junior subordinated notes
decreased as a result of decreases in variable interest rates. The conduit facility matured on May
2, 2008 and was repaid using proceeds from our revolving credit facility. The structured notes
relate to the 2002 Joint Venture, which was consolidated beginning in January 2009, and bear
interest at a fixed rate of 6.67%. Interest expense on our revolving credit facility has increased
due primarily to an increase in the weighted average borrowings under the revolving credit facility
from $4.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $27.5 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 partially offset by a decrease in the weighted average interest rate
from 4.825% during the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 2.50% during the three months ended
March 31, 2009.
Other Expenses
Our salaries and related benefits expense decreased from $1,239,000 during the three months
ended March 31, 2008 to $921,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2009 due primarily to our
reduction in workforce in October 2008. Management estimates annual savings from the cost
reduction initiatives to be approximately $1.0 million to $1.2 million which will primarily be a
reduction of salaries and related benefits.
Permanent impairments on Retained Interests (write-downs of the value of our Retained
Interests) were $60,000 and $281,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, resulting primarily from reductions in future expected cash flows due to decreased
actual prepayments and future prepayment speeds.
Provision for loan losses, net increased to $147,000 during the three months ended March 31,
2009 from $73,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2008. Our provision for loan losses is
comprised of specific and general reserves. Our specific reserves increased from $205,000 at
December 31, 2008 to $341,000 at March 31, 2009 due primarily to devaluations of collateral of
limited service hospitality properties.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flow Analysis
Information on our cash flow was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(810 |
) |
|
$ |
2,475 |
|
|
$ |
(3,285 |
) |
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
$ |
829 |
|
|
$ |
(6,598 |
) |
|
$ |
7,427 |
|
Cash used in financing activities |
|
$ |
(381 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,731 |
) |
|
$ |
1,350 |
|
Operating Activities
The reduction in cash provided by operating activities was primarily caused by greater loans
funded, held for sale, net of proceeds from sale of guaranteed loans (Operating Loan Activity) of
$1,608,000. This was caused by deferring sales of fully funded SBA 7(a) Program loans until the
market improved. During April 2009, we sold approximately $4.5 million (guaranteed portion) of SBA
7(a) Program loans into the secondary market.
Our net cash flow from operating activities is primarily used to fund our dividends. Our
modified cash available for dividend distributions (Modified Cash), as reconciled below, is
defined as cash from operating activities before (1) the change in operating assets and liabilities
and (2) Operating Loan Activity. To the extent Modified Cash does not cover the current dividend
distribution rate or if additional cash is needed based on our working capital needs, the Board of
Trust Managers may choose to modify its current dividend policy. During the three months ended
March 31, 2009, dividend distributions were greater than our Modified Cash by $2,110,000. This was
primarily caused by REIT taxable income timing
differences combined with the declaration of $1.5 million in a special dividend paid in the first
quarter of 2009 that related to 2008. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, dividend
distributions were less than our Modified Cash by $182,000. Management anticipates that our
dividend distributions during 2009 will be greater than our Modified Cash with any shortfall being
funded using our revolving credit facility.
26
The following reconciles net cash flow from operating activities to Modified Cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
$ |
(810 |
) |
|
$ |
2,475 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
Operating Loan Activity |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modified Cash |
|
$ |
1,795 |
|
|
$ |
3,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the primary source of funds was principal
collected on loans, net of loans funded of $1,006,000. During the three months ended March 31,
2008, the primary source of funds was principal collected on Retained Interests of $660,000 while
the primary use of funds was loans funded, net of principal collected on loans receivable of
$6,114,000.
Financing Activities
We used funds in financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
primarily to pay dividends of $3,905,000 and $3,231,000, respectively, and for the repurchase of
common shares during the three months ended March 31, 2009. Our primary source of funds in
financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was proceeds from credit
facilities, net, of $4,300,000 and $1,500,000, respectively.
Sources and Uses of Funds
Liquidity Summary
Our primary source of funds to meet our short-term liquidity needs, including working capital,
dividends, debt service and additional investments, if any, consist of (1) cash flow from
operations, (2) proceeds from principal and interest payments on our unrestricted investments, (3)
borrowings under our revolving credit facility and (4) Secondary Market Loan Sales. We believe
these sources of funds will be sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements for at least the next
twelve months. To a lesser extent, and to the extent available to us, we may utilize (1) proceeds
from potential loan and asset sales, (2) new financings or additional securitization offerings and
(3) proceeds from potential common or preferred equity offerings.
Due to continued market turbulence, we do not anticipate having the ability in the next three
months to access debt capital through new or increased warehouse lines, new securitization
issuances or new trust preferred issuances. We continue to explore capital raising options as well
as strategic alternatives as they present themselves; however, in the event we are not able to
successfully secure extended financing, we will rely on cash flows from operations, principal
payments on our investments, and (if necessary) proceeds from asset and loan sales to satisfy these
requirements. If we are unable to (1) renew, replace or expand our sources of financing, (2)
execute asset and loan sales in a timely manner or to receive anticipated proceeds therefrom or (3)
fully utilize available cash of our SBICs, it may have an adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and ability to make dividends to our shareholders.
If we are unable to make required payments under our borrowings, breach any representation or
warranty of our borrowings or violate any covenant, our lenders may accelerate the maturity of our
debt or require us to pledge collateral. If we are unable to repay our borrowings in such a
situation, (1) we may need to prematurely sell assets or (2) lenders could
force us to take other actions. Any such event may have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity, the value of our common shares and the ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
27
Sources of Funds
In general, we require liquidity to originate new loans and repay debt principal and interest.
Our operating revenues are typically utilized to pay our operating expenses and dividends. We
have been utilizing principal collections on existing loans and Retained Interests and borrowings
under our uncollateralized $45 million revolving credit facility (the Revolver) as our primary
sources of funds. In addition, historically we utilized a combination of the following sources to
generate funds:
|
|
|
Structured loan financings or sales; |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of SBA debentures; |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of junior subordinated notes; and/or |
|
|
|
|
Common equity issuance. |
As discussed previously, these markets (with the possible exception of SBA debentures) are not
available at the present time and there can be no assurance that they will be available in the
future. At our current share price, we do not intend to issue common shares.
Our Revolver matures December 31, 2009. We are currently negotiating to extend the maturity
date of our Revolver; however, the credit markets remain extremely illiquid which may make it
difficult and possibly cost prohibitive to extend our Revolver. We believe that our Revolver will
be extended until at least December 31, 2010. However, the aggregate amount available under our
Revolver may decrease and/or the cost of the Revolver, including any up-front costs and ongoing
interest expense and/or unused fees, could increase. We believe that our current capital needs can
be met by our Revolver and cash on hand. To the extent we need additional capital, there can be no
assurance that we would be able to increase the amount available under our Revolver or identify
other sources of funds at an acceptable cost, if at all. We have availability through December
2009 under our Revolver; however, the limited amount of capital available to originate new loans
has caused us to significantly restrict non-SBA 7(a) Program loan origination activity. In
addition, a reduction in the availability of the above sources of funds could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. If these sources, including
extension of our Revolver at its present level when it matures in December 2009, are not available
in the future, we may have to originate loans at further reduced levels or sell assets, potentially
on unfavorable terms.
We continue to have a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.5:1 at March 31, 2009. This ratio is well
below that of typical specialty commercial finance companies.
As a REIT, we must distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to
maintain our tax status under the Code. Accordingly, to the extent the sources above represent
taxable income, such amounts have historically been distributed to our shareholders. In general,
should we receive less cash from our portfolio of investments, we can lower the dividend so as not
to cause any material cash shortfall. During 2009, we anticipate that our cash flows from
operating activities will be utilized to fund our expected 2009 dividend distributions and
generally will not be available to fund portfolio growth or for the repayment of principal due on
our debt.
Since 2004, our working capital was provided through credit facilities and the issuance of
junior subordinated notes. Prior to 2004, our primary source of long-term funds was structured
loan sale transactions. At the current time, there is no market for commercial loan asset-backed
securitizations. We cannot anticipate when, or if, this market will be available in the future.
Until this market becomes available, our ability to grow is limited.
At March 31, 2009, we had availability of $18.0 million under our Revolver. We are charged
interest on the balance outstanding under our revolver at our election of either the prime rate of
the lender less 75 basis points or 162.5 basis points over either the 30 or 90-day LIBOR. We are
charged an unused fee equal to 37.5 basis points computed based on our daily available balance.
The Revolver requires us to meet certain covenants, the most restrictive of which provides for an
asset coverage test, as defined, based on our cash and cash equivalents, loans receivable and
Retained Interests as a ratio to our senior debt, limits our ability to pay out returns of capital
as part of our dividends and provides for a maximum amount of
problem loans, as defined, as a percentage of equity. We also have minimum equity requirements.
At March 31, 2009, we were in compliance with the covenants of this facility.
28
Uses of Funds
Currently, the primary use of our funds is to originate loans. Our outstanding commitments to
fund new loans were $6.7 million at March 31, 2009, all of which were for prime-rate based loans to
be originated by First Western, the government guaranteed portion of which is intended to be sold
into the secondary market. Commitments have fixed expiration dates. Since some commitments expire
without the proposed loan closing, total committed amounts do not necessarily represent future cash
requirements. During 2009, we anticipate loan originations will range from $20 million to $30
million.
We may use funds to repurchase loans from the QSPEs which (1) become charged-off as defined
in the transaction documents either through delinquency or initiation of foreclosure or (2) reach
maturity. In addition, we may use funds to exercise clean-up calls and repay the outstanding
structured notes in related QSPEs or SPEs, including the 2002 Joint Venture which reached its
clean-up call option during January 2009. While there is no requirement to exercise the
clean-up call provision of the 2003 Joint Venture, if the structured notes are not repaid within
sixty days of the availability of the clean-up call, (1) the interest rate on these notes will
increase from LIBOR plus 1.25% to LIBOR plus 2.50% and (2) any excess cash generated will be used
to repay the structured notes instead of being distributed to us. We anticipate that the 2003
Joint Venture will attain its clean-up call option during the second quarter of 2009. Based on
our liquidity needs, we do not currently anticipate exercise of any clean-up call options.
One of our SBICs has $2.0 million of redeemable preferred stock due in September 2009. We
expect to repay this redeemable preferred stock using the SBICs cash on hand.
Our Board of Trust Managers authorized a share repurchase program for up to $10.0 million for
the purchase of outstanding common shares which expires September 26, 2010. The common shares may
be purchased from time to time in the open market or pursuant to negotiated transactions using our
Revolver. As of April 30, 2009, we had repurchased 230,352 shares under the share repurchase
program for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1,529,000, including commissions. We do
not believe these repurchases will have any effect on compliance with the minimum equity
requirements of our current Revolver.
We paid severance of approximately $1.4 million during April 2009 using cash on hand and our
Revolver. We also anticipate that we will pay dividends in excess of Modified Cash, using our
Revolver, to maintain our REIT status or as approved by our Board of Trust Managers.
IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for a full description of recent
accounting pronouncements including the effect, if any, on our results of operations and financial
condition.
DIVIDENDS
Our shareholders are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the Board of Trust
Managers (the Board). In determining dividend policy, the Board considers many factors
including, but not limited to, expectations for future earnings, REIT taxable income and
maintenance of REIT status, the economic environment, competition, our ability to obtain leverage
and our loan portfolio performance. In general, the Board also uses Modified Cash in determining
the amount of dividends declared. In order to maintain REIT status, PMC Commercial is required to
pay out 90% of REIT taxable income. Consequently, the dividend rate on a quarterly basis will not
necessarily correlate directly to any single factor such as REIT taxable income or earnings
expectations.
The Board declared a $0.225 per share quarterly dividend to common shareholders of record on
March 31, 2009, which was paid on April 13, 2009. However, driven by the lower variable interest
rate environment and significant economic uncertainties, we anticipate a dividend reduction
commencing with our second quarter. Unless market conditions deteriorate
further, given these uncertainties and our focus on liquidity, we anticipate that the dividend will
be no less than $0.16 per share for our second quarter dividend which the Board will then adjust as
needed, on a quarterly basis, thereafter.
In order to meet our 2008 taxable income distribution requirements, we will make an election
under the Code to treat a portion of the distributions declared in 2009 as distributions of 2008s
REIT taxable income. These distributions are known as spillover dividends. The Board may utilize
the shortfall caused by spillover dividends to allow dividends declared in 2009 to exceed our 2009
REIT taxable income.
29
REIT TAXABLE INCOME
REIT taxable income is a financial measure that is presented quarterly to assist investors in
analyzing our performance and is one of the factors utilized by our Board in determining the level
of dividends to be paid to our shareholders.
The following reconciles net income to REIT taxable income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,626 |
|
|
$ |
3,383 |
|
Book/tax difference on depreciation |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Book/tax difference on deferred gains from
property sales |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(338 |
) |
Book/tax difference on Retained Interests, net |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
352 |
|
Severance payments |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Book/tax difference on amortization and accretion |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Asset valuation |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Other book/tax differences, net |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
3,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: taxable REIT subsidiaries income, net of tax |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT taxable income |
|
$ |
1,449 |
|
|
$ |
3,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared |
|
$ |
2,382 |
|
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
10,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a REIT, PMC Commercial generally will not be subject to corporate level Federal income tax
on net income that is currently distributed to shareholders provided the distribution exceeds 90%
of REIT taxable income. We may make an election under the Code to treat a portion of distributions
declared in the current year as distributions of the prior years taxable income. Upon election,
the Code provides that, in certain circumstances, a dividend declared subsequent to the close of an
entitys taxable year and prior to the extended due date of the entitys tax return may be
considered as having been made in the prior tax year in satisfaction of income distribution
requirements.
To the extent the TRSs distribute their retained earnings through dividends to PMC
Commercial, these dividends would be included in REIT taxable income when distributed. Since 2005,
approximately $4.1 million of earnings were accumulated. We distributed $2.0 million of these
earnings from one of our TRSs to PMC Commercial during 2008.
30
ITEM 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in various market metrics. We are
subject to market risk including liquidity risk, real estate risk and interest rate risk as
described below. Although management believes that the quantitative analysis on interest rate risk
below is indicative of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, it does not adjust for potential
changes in credit quality, size and composition of our balance sheet and other business
developments that could affect our financial position and net income. Accordingly, no assurances
can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the potential outcome simulated
by these estimates.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the potential that we would be unable to meet our obligations as they come
due because of an inability to liquidate assets or obtain funding. We are subject to changes in
the debt and collateralized mortgage markets. These markets are currently experiencing
disruptions, which could have an adverse impact on our earnings and financial condition.
Current conditions in the debt markets include lack of liquidity and large risk adjusted
premiums. These conditions have increased the cost and reduced the availability of financing
sources. The market for trading asset-backed securities is currently experiencing disruptions
resulting from reduced investor demand for these securities and increased investor yield
requirements. In light of current market conditions, we expect to finance our loan portfolio with
our current capital and Revolver.
Real Estate Risk
The value of our commercial mortgage loans and our ability to sell such loans, if necessary,
are impacted by market conditions that affect the properties that are collateral for our loans.
Property values and operating income from the properties may be affected adversely by a number of
factors, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
national, regional and local economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
significant rises in gasoline prices within a short period of time if there is a
concurrent decrease in business and leisure travel; |
|
|
|
|
local real estate conditions (including an oversupply of commercial real estate); |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters including hurricanes and earthquakes, acts of war and/or terrorism
and other events that may cause performance declines and/or losses to the owners and
operators of the real estate securing our loans; |
|
|
|
|
changes or continued weakness in limited service hospitality properties; |
|
|
|
|
construction quality, construction cost, age and design; |
|
|
|
|
demographic factors; |
|
|
|
|
increases in operating expenses (such as energy costs) for the owners of the
properties; and |
|
|
|
|
limitations in the availability and cost of leverage. |
In the event property operating income decreases, a borrower may have difficulty repaying our
loan, which could result in losses to us. In addition, decreases in property values reduce the
value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to borrowers to repay our loans, which
could also cause us to suffer losses.
31
The following analysis of our provision for loan losses quantifies the negative impact to our
net income from increased losses on our Retained Portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Ended |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
As reported (1) |
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
488 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
Annual loan losses increase by 50 basis points (2) |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
Annual loan losses increase by 100 basis points (2) |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes reductions of loan losses. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents provision for loan losses based on increases in losses as a percentage of
our weighted average loans receivable for the periods indicated. |
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and
tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors.
Since our loans are predominantly variable-rate, based on LIBOR and the prime rate, our
operating results will depend in large part on LIBOR and the prime rate. One of the primary
determinates of our operating results is differences between the income from our loans and our
borrowing costs. As a result, most of our borrowings are based on LIBOR or the prime rate. The
objective of this strategy is to minimize the impact of interest rate changes on our net interest
income.
VALUATION OF LOANS
Our loans are recorded at cost and adjusted by net loan origination fees and discounts (which
are recognized as adjustments of yield over the life of the loan) and loan loss reserves. In order
to determine the estimated fair value of our loans, we use a present value technique for the
anticipated future cash flows using certain assumptions including a current market discount rate,
potential prepayment risks and loan losses. If we were required to sell our loans at a time we
would not otherwise do so, there can be no assurance that managements estimates of fair values
would be obtained and losses could be incurred.
Our loans are approximately 74% variable-rate at spreads over LIBOR or the prime rate.
Increases or decreases in interest rates will generally not have a material impact on the fair
value of our variable-rate loans. We had $142.3 million of variable-rate loans at March 31, 2009.
The estimated fair value of our variable-rate loans (approximately $135.9 million at March 31,
2009) is dependent upon several factors including changes in interest rates and the market for the
type of loans we have originated.
We had $50.9 million and $39.3 million of fixed-rate loans at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively. The estimated fair value of these fixed-rate loans (approximately $51.1
million at March 31, 2009) is dependent upon several factors including changes in interest rates
and the market for the types of loans that we have originated. Since changes in market interest
rates do not affect the interest rates on our fixed-rate loans, any changes in these rates do not
have an immediate impact on our interest income. Our interest rate risk on our fixed-rate loans is
primarily related to loan prepayments and maturities.
The average maturity of our loan portfolio is less than its average contractual terms because
of prepayments. The average life of mortgage loans tends to increase when the current mortgage
rates are substantially higher than rates on existing mortgage loans and, conversely, decrease when
the current mortgage rates are substantially lower than rates on existing mortgage loans (due to
refinancing of fixed-rate loans).
32
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had $142.3 million and $140.5 million of
variable-rate loans, respectively, and $54.1 million and $49.8 million of variable-rate debt,
respectively. On the differential between our variable-rate loans outstanding and our
variable-rate debt ($88.2 million and $90.7 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively) we have interest rate risk. To the extent variable rates decrease, our interest
income net of interest expense would decrease.
The sensitivity of our variable-rate loans and debt to changes in interest rates is regularly
monitored and analyzed by measuring the characteristics of our assets and liabilities. We assess
interest rate risk in terms of the potential effect on interest income net of interest expense in
an effort to ensure that we are insulated from any significant adverse effects from changes in
interest rates. As a result of our predominately variable-rate portfolio, our earnings are
susceptible to being
reduced during periods of lower interest rates. Based on our analysis of the sensitivity of
interest income and interest expense at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, if the consolidated
balance sheet were to remain constant and no actions were taken to alter the existing interest rate
sensitivity, each hypothetical 100 basis point reduction in interest rates would reduce net income
by approximately $882,000 and $907,000, respectively, on an annual basis.
DEBT
Our debt was comprised of SBA debentures, junior subordinated notes, the Revolver, structured
notes and redeemable preferred stock of subsidiary. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
approximately $17.5 million and $12.0 million, respectively, of our consolidated debt had fixed
rates of interest and was therefore not affected by changes in interest rates. Our variable-rate
debt is based on LIBOR or the prime rate and thus subject to adverse changes in market interest
rates. Assuming there were no increases or decreases in the balance outstanding under our
variable-rate debt at March 31, 2009, each hypothetical 100 basis points increase in interest rates
would increase interest expense and decrease net income by approximately $541,000.
Our fixed-rate debt at March 31, 2009 is comprised primarily of SBA debentures and structured
notes. One SBA debenture ($4.0 million) currently has a prepayment penalty of 1% of the principal
balance.
The following tables present the principal amounts by year of expected maturity, weighted
average interest rates and fair values to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to
interest rate changes of our outstanding debt at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Month Periods Ending March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Fixed-rate debt (2) (3) |
|
$ |
2,753 |
|
|
$ |
2,793 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
$ |
1,032 |
|
|
$ |
9,116 |
|
|
$ |
17,504 |
|
|
$ |
17,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate debt (LIBOR
and prime based) (4) |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
54,070 |
|
|
|
44,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
29,753 |
|
|
$ |
2,793 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
$ |
1,032 |
|
|
$ |
36,186 |
|
|
$ |
71,574 |
|
|
$ |
62,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The estimated fair value is based on a present value calculation based on prices of the same
or similar instruments after considering risk, current interest rates and remaining
maturities. |
|
(2) |
|
The weighted average interest rate of our fixed-rate debt at March 31, 2009 was 6.4%. |
|
(3) |
|
Principal payments on the structured notes are dependent upon cash flows received from the
underlying loans. Our estimate of their repayment is based upon scheduled principal payments
on the underlying loans. Our estimate will differ from actual amounts to the extent we
experience prepayments and/or loan losses. |
|
(4) |
|
The weighted average interest rate of our variable-rate debt at March 31, 2009 was 3.6%. |
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Fixed-rate debt (2) |
|
$ |
1,956 |
|
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,168 |
|
|
$ |
12,044 |
|
|
$ |
12,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate debt (LIBOR
and prime rate based) (3) |
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,070 |
|
|
|
49,770 |
|
|
|
40,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
24,656 |
|
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,238 |
|
|
$ |
61,814 |
|
|
$ |
52,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The estimated fair value is based on a present value calculation based on prices of the same
or similar instruments after considering risk, current interest rates and remaining
maturities. |
|
(2) |
|
The weighted average interest rate of our fixed-rate debt at December 31, 2008 was 6.3%. |
|
(3) |
|
The weighted average interest rate of our variable-rate debt at December 31, 2008 was 5.0%. |
RETAINED INTERESTS
Our Retained Interests are valued based on various factors including estimates of appropriate
discount rates. Changes in the discount rates used in determining the fair value of the Retained
Interests will impact their carrying value. Any appreciation of our Retained Interests is included
in the accompanying balance sheet in beneficiaries equity. Any depreciation of our Retained
Interests is either included in the accompanying statement of income as a permanent impairment or
on our balance sheet in beneficiaries equity as an unrealized loss. Assuming all other factors
(i.e., prepayments, losses, etc.) remained unchanged, if discount rates were 300 basis points and
500 basis points higher than rates estimated at March 31, 2009, the estimated fair value of our
Retained Interests at March 31, 2009 would have decreased by approximately $0.8 million and $1.3
million, respectively.
34
ITEM 4.
Controls and Procedures
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined under rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended) as of March 31, 2009. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
35
PART II
Other Information
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business we are periodically party to certain legal actions and
proceedings involving matters that are generally incidental to our business (i.e., collection of
loans receivable). In managements opinion, the resolution of these legal actions and proceedings
will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the factors disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On September 26, 2008, our Board authorized a share repurchase program for up to $10.0 million
for the purchase of outstanding common shares, expiring September 26, 2010. The common shares may
be purchased from time to time in the open market or pursuant to negotiated transactions. We
purchased 107,826 common shares during the first quarter of 2009 in the open market as described
below.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
Maximum number |
|
|
|
Total number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
shares (or units) |
|
|
(or approximate dollar value) |
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
price paid |
|
|
purchased as part of |
|
|
of shares (or units) that |
|
|
|
(or units) |
|
|
per share |
|
|
publicly announced |
|
|
may yet be purchased |
|
Period |
|
purchased |
|
|
(or unit) |
|
|
plans or programs |
|
|
under the plans or programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2009 |
|
|
28,341 |
|
|
$ |
7.24 |
|
|
|
113,486 |
|
|
$ |
9,201,104 |
|
February 2009 |
|
|
26,714 |
|
|
$ |
7.14 |
|
|
|
140,200 |
|
|
$ |
9,010,486 |
|
March 2009 |
|
|
52,771 |
|
|
$ |
5.57 |
|
|
|
192,971 |
|
|
$ |
8,716,680 |
|
ITEM 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
ITEM 5. Other Information
None.
36
ITEM 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Declaration of Trust (incorporated by reference
to the exhibits to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-11
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 25,
1993, as amended (Registration No. 33-65910)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
(a) |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Declaration of Trust (incorporated by reference to
the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the SEC
on June 25, 1993, as amended (Registration No. 33-65910)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
(b) |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Declaration of Trust (incorporated by reference to
the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1993). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
(c) |
|
Amendment No. 3 to Declaration of Trust (incorporated by reference to
the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Bylaws (incorporated by reference to the
exhibits to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed
with the SEC on June 25, 1993, as amended (Registration No. 33-65910)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Bylaws (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on April 16, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Officer Certification Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Officer Certification Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
**32.1 |
|
|
Section 906 Officer Certification Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
**32.2 |
|
|
Section 906 Officer Certification Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Submitted herewith. |
37
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PMC Commercial Trust
|
|
Date: 5/11/09 |
/s/ Lance B. Rosemore
|
|
|
Lance B. Rosemore |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: 5/11/09 |
/s/ Barry N. Berlin
|
|
|
Barry N. Berlin |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
38
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Officer Certification Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Officer Certification Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 906 Officer Certification Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 906 Officer Certification Chief Financial Officer |
39
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Lance B. Rosemore, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PMC Commercial Trust; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: 05/11/09 |
/s/ Lance B. Rosemore
|
|
|
Lance B. Rosemore |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Barry N. Berlin, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PMC Commercial Trust; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: 05/11/09 |
/s/ Barry N. Berlin
|
|
|
Barry N. Berlin |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Exhibit 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of PMC Commercial Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Lance B. Rosemore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
/s/ Lance B. Rosemore
Lance B. Rosemore
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
May 11, 2009 |
|
|
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of PMC Commercial Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Barry N. Berlin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
/s/ Barry N. Berlin
Barry N. Berlin
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
May 11, 2009 |
|
|
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.