UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10 - Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

OR

For the transition period from _______ to _______ .

Commission File Number 1-13610

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). YES o NO þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). YES o NO þ

As of November 3, 2006, the Registrant had outstanding 10,750,981 Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $.01 per share.

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

PART I

Financial Information

ITEM 1.

Financial Statements

1

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

Note 1. Interim Financial Statements:

The accompanying consolidated balance sheet of PMC Commercial Trust (“PMC Commercial” or together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, “we,” “us” or “our”) as of September 30, 2006 and the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 and beneficiaries’ equity and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, have not been audited by independent accountants. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary to fairly present our financial position at September 30, 2006 and our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

Certain notes and other information have been omitted from the interim financial statements presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (1) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and (2) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our most sensitive estimates involve the valuation of our retained interests in transferred assets and determination of reserves on our receivables.

The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of future financial results.

Note 2. Business:

PMC Commercial is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that either directly or through its subsidiaries, primarily originates loans to small businesses collateralized by first liens on the real estate of the related business. The majority of these loans are to borrowers in the hospitality industry. We also originate loans on commercial real estate to borrowers in the service, retail, multi-family and manufacturing industries and loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) collateralized by business assets and/or real estate. In addition, our investments include the ownership of commercial properties in the hospitality industry. Our common shares are traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “PCC.”

Note 3. Consolidation:

We consolidate entities that we control by ownership of a majority voting interest as well as variable interest entities for which we are considered to be the primary beneficiary. To the extent we do not have a majority voting interest, we use the equity method to account for investments for which we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies. Consolidated net income includes our share of the net earnings of any entity accounted for using the equity method. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PMC Commercial, First Western SBLC, Inc. (“First Western”), PMC Investment Corporation (“PMCIC”), Western Financial Capital Corporation (“Western Financial”), PMC Commercial Trust, Ltd. 1998-1 (“PMCT Trust”), PMC Funding Corp. (“PMC Funding”), PMC Asset Holding, LLC (“Asset Holding”), PMC Conduit, L.P. (“PMC Conduit”), PMC Properties, Inc. (“PMC Properties”) and separate subsidiaries created in conjunction with the purchase of hotel properties in 1999.

On September 29, 2006, we leased a hotel property owned by a separate subsidiary (PMCT Plainfield, L.P.) which was previously consolidated. The hotel property is the primary asset of the separate subsidiary. The lessee has the option, and is expected to exercise this option, to purchase the property for $1,825,000 at termination of the lease in January 2011 or earlier if certain events occur. Our subsidiary received a substantial non-refundable up-front payment of $452,000. Based on this new lease agreement including the fixed price purchase option, the subsidiary was determined to be a variable interest entity. Since we do not expect to absorb the majority of the entity’s future expected losses or receive the entity’s expected residual returns, PMC Commercial is not considered to be the primary beneficiary. Thus, the separate subsidiary is no longer

7

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

consolidated in PMC Commercial Trust’s financial statements and the equity method is used to account for our investment in the separate subsidiary effective September 29, 2006. The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities of PMCT Plainfield, L.P.:

First Western is licensed as a small business lending company that originates loans through the SBA 7(a) Guaranteed Loan Program. PMCIC and Western Financial are licensed specialized small business investment companies under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“SBIA”). PMCT Trust was formed in conjunction with our 1998 structured loan financing transaction. PMC Funding, Asset Holding and PMC Conduit hold assets on our behalf. PMC Properties is the operator, through third party managers, of our limited service hospitality properties.

In addition, we own subordinate financial interests in several non-consolidated special purpose entities (i.e., retained interests in transferred assets (“Retained Interests”)). These are PMC Capital, L.P. 1998-1 (the “1998 Partnership”), PMC Capital, L.P. 1999-1 (the “1999 Partnership”), PMC Joint Venture, L.P. 2000 (the “2000 Joint Venture”), PMC Joint Venture, L.P. 2001 (the “2001 Joint Venture”), PMC Joint Venture, L.P. 2002-1 (the “2002 Joint Venture”) and PMC Joint Venture, L.P. 2003 (the “2003 Joint Venture,” and together with the 2000 Joint Venture, the 2001 Joint Venture and the 2002 Joint Venture, the “Joint Ventures,” and the Joint Ventures together with the 1998 Partnership and the 1999 Partnership, the “QSPEs”) created in connection with structured loan sale transactions.

We account for our Retained Interests in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 140”) and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets.” While we are the servicer of the assets held by these QSPEs, we are required under the transaction documents to comply with strict servicing standards and are subject to the approval of the trustees and/or noteholders regarding any significant issues associated with the assets. As a result, we believe we have relinquished control of the assets sold to the QSPEs. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities, partners’ capital and results of operations of the QSPEs are not included in our consolidated financial statements.

Note 4. Reclassifications:

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income or total beneficiaries’ equity.

Note 5. Share-Based Compensation Plans:

At September 30, 2006, we have options outstanding under share-based compensation plans. We use the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to account for all awards granted, modified or settled.

8

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

We granted 33,250 option awards on June 10, 2006 at an exercise price of $12.72 (the closing price on June 9, 2006) under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. Option awards vest immediately upon grant with five-year contractual terms. The fair value of this option award was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that the options are expected to be outstanding and was based on historical data. The risk-free rate was based on the three-year U.S. Treasury rate corresponding to the expected term of the options. We used historical information to determine our expected volatility, dividend yield and forfeiture rates. We recorded compensation expense of approximately $19,000 related to this option grant during the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

In addition, we issued an aggregate of 9,060 restricted shares to executive officers and our Board of Trust Managers on June 10, 2006 at the then current market price of the shares of $12.72. The restricted share awards vest based on two years of continuous service with one-third of the shares vesting immediately upon issuance of the shares and one-third vesting at the end of each of the next two years. Restricted share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the plan). Compensation expense is being recognized over the vesting period. We recorded compensation expense of approximately $15,000 and $58,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 for this restricted share issuance. At September 30, 2006, there was approximately $58,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to these unvested restricted shares which will be recognized over the next two years.

We granted 36,700 option awards on June 11, 2005 at an exercise price of $14.54. We recorded compensation expense of approximately $25,000 related to this option grant during the nine months ended September 30, 2005.

We issued an aggregate of 9,060 restricted shares to executive officers and our Board of Trust Managers on June 11, 2005 at the then current market price of the shares of $14.54. Compensation expense is being recognized over the vesting period. We recorded compensation expense of approximately $5,000 and $34,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, and approximately $17,000 and $66,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, for this restricted share issuance. At September 30, 2006, there was approximately $15,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to these unvested restricted shares which will be recognized over the next year.

Note 6. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:

In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 154 (“SFAS No. 154”), “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” which replaces Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements — An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28.” SFAS No. 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes retroactive application, or the latest practicable date, as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the reporting of a correction of an error. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 154 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

The FASB issued SFAS No. 155 (“SFAS No. 155”), “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140” in February 2006. SFAS No. 155 (1) permits fair value remeasurement for hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that would otherwise require bifurcation, (2) clarifies which

9

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

interest-only strip receivables are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, (3) establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, (4) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives and (5) amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a QSPE from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. The Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 155 on our consolidated financial statements; however, we do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

The FASB issued SFAS No. 156 (“SFAS No. 156”), “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” in March 2006. SFAS No. 156 requires that all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. Subsequent to initial measurement, an entity may choose to use the amortization method or the fair value method for future measurements. SFAS No. 156 also requires additional disclosures related to servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156 is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 156 on our consolidated financial statements; however, we do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in income tax positions, as defined. FIN 48 imposes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken in a tax return and provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on our consolidated financial statements; however, we do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

The FASB issued SFAS No. 157 (“SFAS No. 157”), “Fair Value Measurements” in September 2006. SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability, establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on our consolidated financial statements; however, we do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (“SAB 108”), “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements,” was issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) during September 2006. SAB 108 expresses SEC staff views regarding the process by which misstatements in financial statements are evaluated for purposes of determining whether financial statement restatement is necessary. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006, and early application is encouraged. We are currently evaluating the impact of SAB 108 on our consolidated financial statements; however, we do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

10

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 7. Loans Receivable, net:

Loans receivable, net, consisted of the following:

Additional information on our loans receivable, net, was as follows:

Our loans receivable were approximately 95% concentrated in the hospitality industry at September 30, 2006. Any economic factors that negatively impact the hospitality industry could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

The activity in our loan loss reserves was as follows:

11

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Impaired loans are defined by generally accepted accounting principles as loans for which it is probable that the lender will be unable to collect all amounts due based on the original contractual terms of the loan. Information on those loans considered to be impaired loans was as follows:

Our impaired loans have decreased from December 31, 2005 to September 30, 2006 due primarily to the foreclosure of the underlying collateral of three limited service hospitality properties.

Note 8. Real Estate Investments and Rent and Related Receivables:

Our real estate investments consisted of the following:

At September 30, 2006, two hotel properties that we own are included in our consolidated financial statements. The properties were originally part of a sale and leaseback transaction commencing in 1998 with Arlington Hospitality, Inc. (“AHI”) whereby we purchased 30 properties from AHI and then leased the properties to a wholly-owned subsidiary of AHI,

12

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Arlington Inns, Inc. (“AII” and together with AHI, “Arlington”). We concurrently entered into a Master Lease Agreement with AHI and AII covering all the properties and entered into a guaranty agreement with AHI whereby AHI guaranteed all obligations of AII under the individual property lease agreements.

During June 2005, AII filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (“Bankruptcy”). On August 31, 2005, AHI filed for Bankruptcy (the “Arlington Bankruptcy”). The January through April 2005 lease payments due from AII were paid while the May and June 2005 lease payments due from AII were not paid. AII made its July 2005 to January 2006 rent payments which were recorded as income when earned.

On January 13, 2006, we received rejection notices on 12 individual property leases and as a result, we took possession and operated 13 hotel properties through third party management companies. During 2006, we sold ten hotel properties for approximately $20.5 million and recognized net gains of approximately $1.9 million and deferred gains of approximately $1.2 million. We financed the sale of these properties through origination of loans aggregating approximately $17.1 million with interest rates of LIBOR plus spreads ranging from 3.75% to 4.80% and maturity and amortization periods of 20 years.

At September 30, 2006, our remaining hotel properties had mortgages (which were assumed in the original purchase from AHI) with significant prepayment penalties. Therefore, we do not anticipate selling these properties until the properties’ market values increase or the prepayment penalties decrease. Until the properties are sold, we will either operate the properties through third party management companies or lease the properties.

On September 29, 2006, we leased a hotel property owned by a separate subsidiary which was previously consolidated. The lessee has the option, and is expected to exercise this option, to purchase the property for $1,825,000 at termination of the lease in January 2011 or earlier if certain events occur. Our subsidiary received a substantial non-refundable up-front payment of $452,000. The separate subsidiary which owns the hotel property is no longer consolidated in PMC Commercial Trust’s financial statements effective September 29, 2006. The operations relating to this property were included in continuing operations in our consolidated statement of income through September 29, 2006.

We generated hotel property revenues of approximately $639,000 and $1,653,000 consisting primarily of room revenues and $526,000 and $1,319,000 in hotel property expenses consisting primarily of operating and general and administrative expenses related to our hotel properties during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. We performed a recoverability test to determine if the future undiscounted cash flows over our expected holding period for the hotel properties exceeded the carrying value of the hotel properties. Future cash flows are based on estimated future property operations or rent payments to be received on the hotel properties and expected proceeds from the sale. Based on this analysis, no impairment losses were recorded during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2006.

At September 30, 2006, our rent and related receivables consisted of unpaid rent, property taxes, legal fees incurred, termination damages, notes receivable and other charges (the “Arlington Claims”) of approximately $2,747,000 before reserves. As a result of the uncertainty and timing of collection, our claim in the Arlington Bankruptcy is well in excess of our recorded investment in the Arlington Claims.

We performed an analysis of our anticipated future proceeds related to the Arlington Bankruptcy to determine the collectibility of our investment in the rent and related receivables based on best available information provided to us through the bankruptcy proceedings. As a result, we established an allowance of approximately $1,255,000 during 2005. We recorded additional allowances of $500,000 and $925,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, primarily resulting from reductions in available cash due to unanticipated and unforecasted cash expenditures by Arlington. Accordingly, our net recorded investment was $567,000 as of September 30, 2006. To the extent there is a reduction of the anticipated future proceeds, we would record an additional allowance against these receivables.

Note 9. Retained Interests:

In our structured loan sale transactions, we contributed loans receivable to a QSPE in exchange for cash and beneficial interests in that entity. The QSPE issued notes payable (the “Structured Notes”) to unaffiliated parties (“Structured Noteholders”). The QSPE then distributed a portion of the proceeds from the Structured Notes to us. The Structured Notes

13

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

are collateralized solely by the assets of the QSPE which means that should the financial assets in the QSPE be insufficient for the trustee to make payments on the Structured Notes, the Structured Noteholders have no recourse against us. Upon the completion of our structured loan sale transactions, we recorded the transfer of loans receivable as a sale in accordance with SFAS No. 140. As a result, the loans receivable contributed to the QSPE, the Structured Notes issued by the QSPE, and the operating results of the QSPE are not included in our consolidated financial statements. The difference between (1) the carrying value of the loans receivable sold and (2) the sum of (a) the cash received and (b) the relative fair value of our Retained Interests, constituted the gain or loss on sale. Retained Interests are carried at estimated fair value, with realized gains and permanent impairments recorded in net income and unrealized gains and losses recorded in beneficiaries’ equity.

We completed joint structured loan sale transactions with PMC Capital, Inc., our affiliate through common management. Our interests related to the loans receivable we contributed to these structured loan sale transactions are the “Originated Structured Loan Sale Transactions.” During 2004, we acquired PMC Capital, Inc.’s Retained Interests in the Joint Ventures and 100% of the 1998 Partnership and the 1999 Partnership (collectively, the “Acquired Structured Loan Sale Transactions”).

Information pertaining to our Originated Structured Loan Sale Transactions as of September 30, 2006 was as follows:

14

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Information pertaining to our Acquired Structured Loan Sale Transactions as of September 30, 2006 was as follows:

At September 30, 2006, none of the loans sold to the QSPEs were delinquent over 60 days as to principal and interest.

First Western has Retained Interests related to the sale of loans originated pursuant to the SBA 7(a) Guaranteed Loan Program. The SBA guaranteed portions of First Western’s loans receivable are sold to either dealers in government guaranteed loans receivable or institutional investors (“Secondary Market Loan Sales”) as the loans are fully funded. On Secondary Market Loan Sales, we may retain an excess spread between the interest rate paid to us from our borrowers and the rate we pay to the purchaser of the guaranteed portion of the note and servicing costs (“Excess Spread”). At September 30, 2006, the aggregate principal balance of First Western’s serviced loans receivable on which we had an Excess Spread was approximately $42.1 million and the weighted average Excess Spread was approximately 0.7%. In determining the fair value of our Retained Interests related to Secondary Market Loan Sales, our assumptions at September 30, 2006 included a prepayment speed of 18% per annum and a discount rate of 12.5%.

The estimated fair value of our Retained Interests is based upon an estimate of the discounted future cash flows we will receive. In determining the present value of expected future cash flows, estimates are made in determining the amount and timing of those cash flows and the discount rates. The amount and timing of cash flows is generally determined based on estimates of loan losses and anticipated prepayment speeds relating to the loans receivable contributed to the QSPE. Actual loan losses and prepayments may vary significantly from assumptions. The discount rates that we utilize in computing the estimated fair value are based upon estimates of the inherent risks associated with each cash flow stream. Due to the limited

15

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

number of entities that conduct transactions with similar assets, the relatively small size of our Retained Interests and the limited number of buyers for such assets, no readily ascertainable market exists. Therefore, our estimate of the fair value may or may not vary from what a willing buyer would pay for these assets.

The components of our Retained Interests are as follows:

16

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Our Retained Interests consisted of the following:

The difference between the estimated fair value and the cost of our Retained Interests is reflected in our consolidated balance sheets as net unrealized appreciation of Retained Interests.

17

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following sensitivity analysis of our Retained Interests as of September 30, 2006 highlights the volatility that results when prepayments, losses and discount rates are different than our assumptions:

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. Values based on changes in these assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated since the relationship of the change in an assumption to the change in fair value is not linear. The effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of our Retained Interests is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor are not isolated from changes in another which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

We monitor the governing pooling and servicing agreements for each of our structured loan sale transactions and believe the servicing-related terms set forth therein are industry standard and consistent with QSPE criteria. However, views about permitted servicing activities involving QSPEs may not be consistent among organizations. As accounting standard setters continue to interpret QSPE criteria under SFAS No. 140, there may be a material resultant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In accordance with SFAS No. 140, our consolidated financial statements do not include the assets, liabilities, partners’ capital, revenues or expenses of the QSPEs. As a result, at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 our consolidated balance sheets do not include the $222.4 million and $276.1 million of assets, respectively, and $170.3 million and $220.8 million of liabilities, respectively, related to our structured loan sale transactions recorded by our QSPEs. At September 30, 2006, the partners’ capital of our QSPEs was approximately $52.1 million compared to the value of the associated Retained Interests of approximately $56.9 million.

18

PMC COMMERCIAL TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following information summarizes the financial position of the QSPEs at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.

Summary of Financial Position:

The following information summarizes the results of operations of the QSPEs.

Summary of Operations: